Skip to main content

Passengers exiting a northbound TTC bus on Sherbourne St. near Bloor St. East, are photographed on Oct. 31, 2018.

Fred Lum

There is broad public support for the province taking over transit systems across Southern Ontario, according to a new poll.

The survey was done for the Toronto Region Board of Trade, which is pushing for such an upload and for the creation of a transit governance body it dubs Superlinx. Its proposal goes well beyond the Ontario government’s current plan, now being studied behind closed doors by a provincially appointed panel, to take over Toronto’s subway network.

“Having transit systems managed and operated within municipal boundaries simply doesn’t reflect the reality of where people live and where they work,” Board of Trade president Jan De Silva said Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

“The public is supportive of this [upload], and I think that’s an important new piece of information as we’re bringing this forward, the fact that 79 per cent of the region supports this direction.”

A merged transit agency run by the province got majority support in each region in the Environics Research poll, from a low of 65 per cent in Hamilton to a high of 89 per cent in York Region. The board initially floated their Superlinx idea nearly a year ago, saying it would replace Metrolinx, which operates GO Transit and a number of small transit agencies, and take over the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC).

The idea has proved controversial and one critic is Toronto councillor Gord Perks, who argues that rather than a governance problem with transit, there’s a shortage of funding. He’s worried that the needs of Toronto transit riders, by far the biggest group in the region, will get lost amid political priorities at the province level.

“As we’ve seen with the operation of Metrolinx, you can appoint the board all you want but it’s going to be the minister’s office that decides, or the premier’s office, that decides what happens,” he said.

“Right now, there’s a match between your local government and your local transit system. The person that you elect in your neighbourhood has some kind of say over how much transit service you get. If that becomes a provincial agency … then [a transportation minister] who was elected by the people of the Ottawa Valley will decide how frequent your service is, and that’s unacceptable.”

The provincial government including in their election campaign a promise to take over Toronto’s subway network and assume responsibility for expansion planning.

Mayor John Tory has argued that council could only agree to such an upload if there were clear benefits to the city. In May, council voted 30-6 in favour of a motion that included a clause making clear that subways should continue to be owned by the city. Mr. Tory was absent for that vote, although many of his allies sided with the majority.

Story continues below advertisement

The Tories' subway upload idea is now being studied by a government-appointed panel led by Michael Lindsay, a former vice-president at Infrastructure Ontario, which is expected to report back next year. Mr. Lindsay has not spoken publicly about his work but has been meeting with transit leaders, some of whom have widely divergent views of how difficult such an upload might be.

Metrolinx CEO Phil Verster told reporters in September that it would be “quite straightforward” for his agency to take over the much more heavily used subway system. But TTC chief executive Rick Leary sent a note to staff a few days later, warning that any such move would be complicated.

“The suggestion that [the TTC’s] its rolling stock, yards, carhouses, tunnels, signals, stations, ventilation, electrical, drainage and all other interdependent systems can be somehow easily transferred or uploaded is simply not the case,” Mr. Leary wrote.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter