Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Despite a slide in residential home prices and sales, Toronto brought in $30-million more than expected from its land-transfer tax in the first three months of the year, thanks to an unexpected boost from the commercial real estate market.

Critics have compared the city’s operating budget to a gamble on the real estate market, as Toronto has relied heavily on ballooning revenues from its land-transfer tax to balance its books every year.

In recent years, Toronto has relied heavily on revenues from ballooning land-transfer taxes, a practice some senior city officials have warned could backfire in the event of a real estat market crash.

COLE BURSTON/The Canadian Press

Senior city officials have repeatedly warned that this could backfire in a real estate market crash, forcing the city – which by law cannot borrow to run an operating budget deficit – to slash services or hike property taxes.

Story continues below advertisement

But according to a new report from the city’s interim chief financial officer, Joe Farag, Toronto collected $156-million from the tax in the first quarter, $30-million, or 24 per cent, more than the $126-million originally projected.

The report, headed to council’s budget committee on Monday, credits “higher-than-anticipated non-residential market activity” for the boost.

Gary Crawford, the Scarborough councillor who serves as Mayor John Tory’s budget chief, said he also believes the city is still too reliant on the tax – but insists predictions of imminent doom were overstated.

“Everybody said the sky was falling … but we are probably going to be fine,” Mr. Crawford said in an interview.

City officials are still predicting that by year’s end, the tax will bring in the full $817-million they had banked on, the same total it produced last year. As a precautionary measure, the city’s 2018 budget assumed that the land-transfer tax would remain flat, despite the fact it usually brings in tens of millions more than projected each year.

Councillor Gord Perks, a critic of Toronto’s mayor, says the city has for too long used windfall revenue from the real estate market to keep property taxes unrealistically low. He says he is not reassured by the latest numbers, which he suggests may just put off a financial crisis by several months or a year.

“Evidently, we caught a lucky break,” Mr. Perks said in an interview. “But it seems to be a one-time lucky break. The fundamentals are still deeply worrisome.”

Story continues below advertisement

The extra tax revenue in the first quarter comes despite headlines about the continuing sag in Toronto’s residential property market. According to the latest numbers from the Canadian Real Estate Association, prices in the Greater Toronto Area were down 5 per cent in April on average compared with the same month last year.

In a report on the city’s long-term financial plans released in March, then-city manager Peter Wallace warned Toronto City Council of the danger of relying on “volatile” land-transfer tax revenue, which he described as a “moderate but growing risk.”

City officials have been watching the tax closely. According to a March 6 e-mail obtained by The Globe and Mail through a freedom-of-information request, Mr. Wallace was told that land-transfer tax revenues were down about 15 per cent in January and February from 2017 numbers. However, city staff said the market typically picks up in May.

In contrast to the city’s cooling residential market, observers say low unemployment and a bustling economy has Toronto’s commercial property market on fire. City officials say the boost to tax revenue came in March from a series of eight non-residential transactions all worth more than $40-million.

Typically, 25 per cent of land-transfer tax revenues come from commercial lands sales, with residential sales making up the rest.

“The industrial markets are just red-hot,” said Stuart Barron, the national director of research for real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield. “You might say that in the past 35 years, we’ve never seen anything like it.”

Story continues below advertisement

The report going to budget committee on Monday also projects the city will see a $10.1-million shortfall over all on its $11-billion operating budget by the end of 2018.

It blames the problem on new spending by the city’s shelter department, which has been dealing with an influx of homeless people and refugee claimants, and added hiring and overtime costs for Toronto police, which has said some of the bills come from recent high-profile investigations.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies