Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Public editor: An unfair photo of our PM?

Progress toward multilateralism is less emotionally satisfying to some than yelling at the world from the rooftops.

The Canadian Press

When is a news photo of a politician an unfair choice and when does it back up the point of an article?

A reader in Calgary wondered why the photo above was chosen to go with a comment article on the problem with Canada's foreign policy.

"Why would you show PM Harper yawning instead of any of the numerous other facial expressions a human face offers?" the reader wondered. "The benign expression of the two ministers behind him might be appropriate. Maybe even an expression of him smiling, or indicating incredulous or reflection.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm curious who decides these things and what motivates a decision," he said.

I checked with Comment editor Natasha Hassan, who decides with her editors which photographs to use to illustrate certain columns. "Generally, the photos we select to accompany opinion pieces are meant to help illustrate the point or argument being made by the author, and to work in tandem with the headline and other display copy.

"In this case, the author was arguing that Stephen Harper's foreign policy stand has made Canada irrelevant to the main issues on the world stage. Our editor selected a photo of the Prime Minister in an international setting looking, literally, disengaged – or yawning at the process around him."

Photo editor Moe Doiron added that when selecting photos, "we always make an effort to match the tone and emotion of the story."

"I think it's important for photos to not only capture a mood, but not to be boring. Pictures of political leaders are so often stage-managed or flat. What you really don't want to see are those handout photos, that show anyone in the best possible light. That's not the purpose of news photos."

News photos also need to show the full range of the politician's emotions (remember so many great Rob Ford photos demonstrating anger, boredom, astonishment, etc.) It is great to show emotion, action and even a bit of humour as long as it is in keeping with the message of the article. In this case, I think this particular photo added to the story and was fair.

But what do you think? Please leave a comment or send me an email at

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Public Editor

Sylvia Stead has been a reporter and editor at the Globe since 1975, after graduating from the University of Western Ontario in Journalism with a minor in Political Science. She won the Board of Governors Award there in 1974. As a reporter, Sylvia covered courts, education and Queen's Park. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨