Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Public editor: The top five things that get under our readers’ skin

The top 5 concerns expressed by Globe and Mail readers.

Getty Images/iStockphoto

In the past year, I have noticed some common threads running through the many questions and comments I receive from our readers. The specifics vary, of course, depending on what's in the news, but here are my top 5 reader concerns (and what to make of them).

1. Bias: Readers who are politically engaged can be passionate about news coverage, columns and editorials, especially during election campaigns, when media coverage matters most. At times, some of them suspect The Globe and Mail of favouring one political leader or party over the others in its reporting. In such cases, it is important that the editors know what the public thinks, through e-mails, letters to the editor or online comments.

Some readers also feel that politicians are subjected to such close scrutiny that prospective candidates lose interest in seeking public office.

Story continues below advertisement

But others will argue that the media have a duty to inform – even if doing so has an impact on personal privacy.

2. Online nastiness: People can be passionate, and debates, even heated ones, are good in a democratic society. But some topics attract bullies, trolls or racists, who shut down reasonable discussion. At a recent meeting of people like me, colleagues from around the world said the same subjects bring out the worst: the Middle East, immigration and women's and gay rights (in Canada, I would add First Nations).

News organizations are trying different tactics to provide open forums while keeping personal attacks and extremism at bay, but the problem persists. I hear from readers every week either wondering why online comments have been closed on some stories or why certain remarks haven't been removed.

3. Lack of coverage: This is an interesting one. Reporters strive for scoops, and can be reluctant to match someone else's. Readers don't always care who is first – but they do care if a story is missing, especially one given major play elsewhere. Even if something has been dominant online all day, if it isn't in the morning paper, readers wonder why. Many still expect top stories to be validated by appearing in print.

4. Spelling and grammar: We expect the highest standard for the written word in The Globe. Yet problems persist – misspelled names, wrong dates or the dreaded homonym errors – and rarely, as shown by the corrections in the paper, escape our eagle-eyed readers.

5. Puzzle problems: It rarely happens, but a crossword or Sudoku can go missing, be repeated or be solved incorrectly. People truly enjoy their puzzles, so if there is an error, I soon hear about it.

Are there other areas you feel need improving? Please let me know for future columns (or my online blog) at publiceditor@globeandmail.com.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Public Editor

Sylvia Stead has been a reporter and editor at the Globe since 1975, after graduating from the University of Western Ontario in Journalism with a minor in Political Science. She won the Board of Governors Award there in 1974. As a reporter, Sylvia covered courts, education and Queen's Park. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨