Skip to main content

Here is a question that comes up fairly frequently: Why are comments on some articles open and on others closed?

One reader wrote to say this was discussed at a social event. "The consensus was a frustration in that the practice seems almost arbitrary. One recent example is Margaret Wente's column The distorted reality of 'Big Ears Teddy'. If any column (or columnist, for that matter) deserves comment, it is this one and yet comments were closed. It strikes me that if a piece has sufficient merit to warrant its posting, then it surely ought to be open to comment. Else, it should be removed."

Another reader wrote in about the same column. "So I can't express my disappointment. … I don't think eight women 'are all cooked up' in cahoots with a jilted ex. Not when we've seen how this story goes for women. Not when women get doxxed and worse for merely speaking openly about sexism in our culture, let alone physical or sexual abuse. … I would also point out that if you're going to publish a column, you should be prepared to ride the lightning in the comments."

Story continues below advertisement

"Please explain, or point me in the direction where I can gain an understanding of the G&M's decisions on this matter," the first reader said.

On Tuesday, globeandmail.com's executive editor, Jim Sheppard, reminded editors in an internal memo that there have been a number of stories, such as the Ottawa attack, the Jian Ghomeshi case and others, where comments have been closed in limited circumstances. He said this is normally done where there is a danger of commenters committing libel or prejudicing an accused's right to a fair trial. He cited this distinction:

• Stories about possible criminal activities or where the danger of a future lawsuit is real should be closed. These include, for example, anything on the shooter in Ottawa or Ghomeshi's actions, confirmed or alleged.

• Stories that are primarily about broader issues that arise from such incidents – such as national security vs. personal privacy, or the prevalence of sexual harassment in the workplace – should be premoderated.

Premoderated means that comments are permitted but are vetted before publication.

There were some stories open to comments on the Ghomeshi matter and also on the Ottawa shootings, but editors generally chose a few stories to be open and not all. Mr. Sheppard says editors are told to be safe, rather than sorry, in such cases.

While I understand the need to close comments on some articles, I agree that on many subjects premoderation is a better idea than simply closing comments. In general, I think the readers have a point about columns and I think there should be a bias toward keeping opinion columns open to comments to allow for a free discussion and debate of the issues.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter