Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Ram's new 2500 and 3500 trucks fuelled the company's first-place finish.

Gene J. Puskar/The Associated Press

When it comes to the quality of new vehicles, which brands excel and which fail? The benchmark is determined by J.D. Power’s annual Initial Quality Study, or IQS. It measures the number of problems experienced by customers after 90 days of owning a vehicle. The study examines 223 problems in nine categories, covering everything from powertrains to driving assistance features to infotainment systems. To determine the quality, J.D. Power measures the number of problems per 100 vehicles, or PP100; the lower the score, the higher the quality and vice versa. Good news – the quality in new vehicles has improved slightly – up two per cent from 2020, with 20 of the 32 brands scoring better than last year. But which brands are on top? And which brands are at the bottom of the list?

Highest ranked

Ram

More good news for Stellantis. Ram took the top spot in new-vehicle quality, with a score of 128 PP100 vehicles. For the first time ever, a truck brand received the top honour. Ram’s first-place finish was fuelled by positive feedback from owners of new Ram 2500 and 3500 trucks, which came out on top in the large heavy-duty pickup category, beating out Ford’s Super Duty truck. The Ram 1500 ranked second in the large light-duty pickup category, after the Toyota Tundra. Ram has improved its rankings significantly over the years – two years ago, it held the 21st spot in the 2019 IQS.

Dodge

Here’s a pleasant surprise – Dodge, which is owned by Stellantis, came in second place with 139 problems per 100 vehicles. One of its top-quality vehicles was the Dodge Charger sedan – it came in third place in the large car category after the Chrysler 300 and the first place Nissan Maxima, which incidentally, also achieved the highest score of any model with only 85 PP100 vehicles in this year’s study.

Story continues below advertisement

Lexus

Lexus takes third place in the 2021 IQS with 144 problems per 100 vehicles. It was also the highest-ranking premium brand. Many of its models excelled in the study – the Lexus RC was the top-ranked compact premium car; while the Lexus UX ranked first in the small premium SUV category. Lexus’ flagship SUV, the RX, took the top spot in mid-size luxury SUVs. And, Toyota’s manufacturing plant that builds the Canadian-made RX in Cambridge, Ontario also received the Bronze Plant Quality Award for producing vehicles with the fewest defects or malfunctions.

Lowest ranked

VW

And now the bad news. The third-lowest brand in initial quality is Volkswagen, one of the world’s largest auto makers that nevertheless saw 213 problems per 100 vehicles. While J.D. Power won’t disclose specifics, overall, the study found infotainment is a problematic issue with 25 per cent of all problems related to the infotainment systems. The most common complaint by new-vehicle owners was by far Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity, especially when it’s operated wirelessly.

Audi

More bad news for Volkswagen. Audi, one of VW Group’s premium nameplates, fared poorer than VW. It came in second-last place. In fact, it was the worst premium brand in the study with an average of 240 problems per 100 vehicles. But Audi isn’t the only luxury auto maker facing quality issues. According to the study, for the past six years, owners of mass market vehicles experienced fewer problems, on average, than owners of premium vehicles. Premium brands generally equip vehicles with more complex technology, which can cause problems for some owners. This year, the only premium brands that performed better than the industry average was Lexus and Genesis with 148 PP100.

Chrysler

Chrysler’s position out of 32 brands may seem a bit odd considering many Chrysler parts are shared with Dodge, which did well in this year’s IQS. The only explanation from J.D. Power came from Pacific Communications Group, J.D. Power’s public relations company. “While Dodge and Chrysler are part of the same company (Stellantis), IQS is a measure of initial quality as related by consumers who own specific brands. While they might share some parts, there are many extended reasons why two such brands would differ in terms of quality (assembly, technology content, engineering and design, among them),” Shane Smith, president of Pacific Communications Group, wrote in an e-mail.

At least, Chrysler’s last-place finish is good news for Land Rover, which formerly held the worst spot in 2020. This year, the tables turned; Chrysler and Land Rover swapped spots. In the 2020 IQS, Chrysler was in 27th spot with 189 PP100 and Land Rover was last with 228 PP100. In 2021, Land Rover has moved up the ranks to 27th with 200 PP100; while Chrysler dropped to last spot with 251 PP100.

Shopping for a new car? Check out the Globe Drive Build and Price Tool to see the latest discounts, rebates and rates on new cars, trucks and SUVs. Click here to get your price.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies