Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Vancouver transportation planners have announced a proposed 'Climate Emergency Parking Program,' which would charge drivers for permits to park on the city’s residential streets. The permit charges would be higher for cars deemed high polluters.

Alia Youssef/The Globe and Mail

If you buy a new SUV in Vancouver next year, it could cost you an extra $1,000 a year to park on your street.

The city is considering adding an annual pollution charge to its residential parking permits.

“Vehicles are responsible for 40 per cent of carbon pollution in Vancouver,” said Paul Storer, the city’s director of transportation. “The goal is to really encourage people to buy zero-emissions vehicles or low-polluting vehicles.”

Story continues below advertisement

The city is proposing a three-tier pricing scheme that would apply to vehicles with a model year of 2023 or any year after.

Vehicles that emit less than 200 grams of carbon dioxide for every kilometre driven wouldn’t pay any extra on top of their annual parking fees.

That would include electric vehicles (EVs), most hybrids and many small and mid-sized vehicles.

Cars that emit 200g to 225g CO2/km would pay an extra $500 a year, and cars that emit more than 225g CO2/km would pay $1,000 a year.

So which cars would have to pay extra? Looking at 2021 emissions levels – the most recent year with available data – for Honda, for instance, the base Civic, Accord and CR-V are in the first tier.

The Accord Sport and Civic Type R, which both have two-litre engines, are in the second tier.

The bigger vehicles, including the Honda Odyssey, Pilot and Ridgeline, are all in the third tier.

Story continues below advertisement

But why doesn’t the plan include 2022 and older model years?

“We didn’t want to be penalizing people for decisions they’ve already made,” Storer said.

There would be exemptions for wheelchair-modified vehicles, since they may not have a readily-available EV-equivalent. But the city is not proposing an exemption for larger vehicles, including trucks and vans, that residents need for their jobs.

“I would have to see the proposal in detail, but it seems unfair for someone who needs a pickup truck or a van for work and doesn’t have an electric option right now,” said Daniel Breton, president and CEO of Electric Mobility Canada (EMC). “They’re being penalized.’

But, if someone owns an existing truck or buys a used pre-2023 truck, they wouldn’t have to pay under Vancouver’s plan, the city said in an e-mail.

The plan’s details could still change, Storer said. The city is taking public feedback on the plan before sending the final version to city council for approval this fall.

Story continues below advertisement

“Parking ends up being an emotional issue for people – particularly parking at home,” Storer said. “We’ll see what people think.”

Potential money maker?

Right now, only about ten percent of Vancouver’s residential streets require a parking permit. But, as part of this plan, the city is considering requiring overnight parking permits on all other residential streets.

So, on streets that don’t require a permit now, residents would have to pay a $45 annual fee to park from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. Plus, they’d have to pay the annual pollution surcharge.

The plan could impact more than 150,000 vehicles that use street parking in Vancouver, Storer said.

The city predicts that the plan could raise $60 million by 2025, Storer said. That money would go to help fund projects in the city’s emergency climate action plan, including protected bike lanes and wider sidewalks, adding more EV charging stations, and improving bus routes.

Story continues below advertisement

“That’s about a quarter of the funding we need,” Storer said. “We want to make it easier for people to get to around by biking, walking and transit.”

That emergency plan also includes a congestion toll that would charge people to drive downtown. The city is still figuring out how that toll might work.

Residents say they prefer user fees over property-tax increases to fund new initiatives, Storer said.

And if the extra fees encourage some people to abandon their cars entirely? So much the better, Storer said.

“EVs are good, but walking, biking and transit are better ways to get around,” Storer said. “That’s true from an environmental perspective, a health perspective and just in terms of transportation functionality.”

Tried in other cities

Story continues below advertisement

In Sydney, Australia and some boroughs of Montreal, residents pay less for parking permits for greener cars. Although, the difference between EVs and gas guzzlers is a lot less than what’s being proposed in Vancouver.

In Montreal’s Plateau neighbourhood, for instance, annual fees are based on the size of a car’s engine. They range from $164 a year – for EVs and gas-powered cars with a 1.6-litre or smaller engine – to $263 a year for cars with an engine bigger than 3.41 litres. So, a gas-guzzler costs about $100 more a year to park.

The plan was introduced there in 2019 to help reduce the borough’s $2-million deficit.

EMC’s Breton thinks a parking surcharge is unlikely to encourage a lot of people to switch to electric.

“Instead of charging more for parking, you should be charging more at the provincial level to buy a polluting vehicle,” Breton said. “When it’s an annual fee, people don’t see it. It’s like the gas tax – even if we raise the gas tax by ten cents, people don’t see the impact right away.”

Right now, Quebec is the only province which charges fees for polluting vehicles. It charges an up-to-$212 fee when buying a new or used gas guzzlers and then an annual registration fee. Breton would like the province to charge a much larger fee for new vehicles and, potentially, not charge an annual fee at all.

Story continues below advertisement

“If you look at the system in Europe, people can pay up to 10,000 euros [C$15,000] more upfront when they buy gas guzzlers,” Breton said. “It’s a feebate system – that money could fund rebates for EVs.”

Whatever the scheme is, there has to be an exception for people who need bigger vehicles, Breton said.

“What if you have a family of seven?” Breton said. “I think [fees] can be an important way and an effective way to get people to change habits, but until we have a bigger selection of EVs, it would not be fair to charge everyone.”

Shopping for a new car? Check out the Globe Drive Build and Price Tool to see the latest discounts, rebates and rates on new cars, trucks and SUVs. Click here to get your price.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies