Skip to main content

Car News Push to legalize most forms of e-bikes, e-scooters sets up potential clash in New York

A package of four City Council bills would legalize most forms of e-bikes.

MARK ABRAMSON/The New York Times News Service

Mayor Bill de Blasio has called electric bicycles “a real danger,” and “a serious part of the problem” when it comes to the safety of city streets. He celebrated a police crackdown last year in which hundreds were confiscated.

Now a package of four City Council bills, set to be introduced Wednesday, would legalize most forms of e-bikes, the scourge of many New York residents and also a staple of the food-delivery workers who serve them.

The legislation, which would also legalize electric scooters, would allow not only electric bicycles that give extra support to a pedalling rider, but also those that could be operated without pedalling, by engaging a motorcycle-like handlebar throttle.

Story continues below advertisement

The legislation, a draft of which was obtained by The New York Times, is likely to set off a public confrontation with de Blasio, whose administration has insisted that state law bans electric bicycles that operate with a throttle – the primary sort of e-bike used by delivery cyclists, many of whom are recent immigrants.

“We love our city but let’s be clear, crossing the street in New York City should not be a harrowing experience,” de Blasio said last fall as he announced stepped-up enforcement by the Police Department against e-bikes. His stance angered some immigrant advocates.

In April, the city’s Department of Transportation tried to find a middle ground, allowing for pedal-assist bicycles but retaining a ban on bicycles that do not have to be pedalled. De Blasio has said state law prohibits e-bicycles that operate without being pedalled.

That is where e-scooters come into play.

Lobbyists for the e-scooter sharing services Bird and Lime have been pressing the City Council to grant the companies permission to operate in New York City, as they do in cities including San Diego and Washington.

Bird had lawyers study the relevant law, and the company argues that e-scooters could be allowed in New York City under a section of state law that permits the city to regulate certain kinds of limited-use vehicles. The section of law also applies to e-bikes, advocates say.

With that in mind, the City Council is prepared to introduce one bill to legalize e-scooters and a second to legalize two forms of e-bikes. Another bill would allow for a pilot program to test the viability of e-scooter sharing in a limited area of the city – along the corridor that will be hit hardest by the shutdown of the L train next year.

Story continues below advertisement

Riders would use Bird’s app to locate available e-scooters and pay a per-minute fee to ride them. The system is dockless, so riders would leave them wherever their trip ends.

But the e-bike section of the legislation is the most complicated. The law provides for “a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor” that “may be used to propel such bicycle without the operator pedalling.” The maximum speed for such bicycles, as it is for pedal-assist bicycles, would be 20 mph. (E-scooters would be limited to 15 mph.)

Councilman Rafael L. Espinal Jr., a sponsor of the bills, has been a supporter of e-bikes for years. He said the push to allow e-scooters presented an opportunity.

“I believe if we’re going to have a conversation around allowing e-scooters, we can’t move forward without addressing the e-bikes,” Espinal, D-Brooklyn, said. “What we’re trying to do is classify the e-bikes and scooters as devices instead of vehicles.” He said he believed that the City Council could do so under the law.

“The mayor’s position has always been that e-bikes are a nuisance, a problem, within the five boroughs,” he said. “I think we found a path forward.”

Corey Johnson, the council speaker, stopped short of endorsing the bills, saying instead in a statement that he would “follow this legislation closely as it moves through the legislative process.”

Story continues below advertisement

“I have sympathy for these delivery drivers who are being hit with tickets while they are trying to do their jobs,” Johnson, D-Manhattan, said, “and I am open to alternative means of transportation.”

Seth Stein, a spokesman for de Blasio, said: “While e-scooters are illegal under state and city law, the mayor is committed to innovation as part of his all-of-the-above transportation strategy to get New Yorkers moving again. We look forward to reviewing the proposals.”

Council members have been sensitive to the politics of allowing e-scooters, which may be seen as catering to younger and wealthier residents jetting around town, while banning e-bikes of the sort mostly used for work by poorer New Yorkers. One of the bills would create a program that would provide funds to poor workers who may need to adjust their e-bikes to make them legal under the new laws.

The scooter company, Bird, is also aware of that perception, and presents itself as agnostic on the subject of e-bikes. The company has also stressed the usefulness of its scooters for city residents outside Manhattan in areas not well served by the subway.

“We are excited about these bills,” Paul Steely White, director of safety policy and advocacy at Bird, said. White thanked the council for “leadership on increasing mobility options and expanding transportation access for New Yorkers across the five boroughs.”

Shopping for a new car? Check out the new Globe Drive Build and Price Tool to see the latest discounts, rebates and rates on new cars, trucks and SUVs. Click here to get your price.

Story continues below advertisement

Sign up for the weekly Drive newsletter, delivered to your inbox for free. Follow us on Instagram, @globedrive.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter