Skip to main content

Pamela Wallin speaks with the media as she leaves the Senate.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Senate, tortuously and belatedly, has arrived at a fair disposition of the expenses improprieties of Senators Pamela Wallin, Mike Duffy and Patrick Brazeau. It was also right to separate the three motions to suspend them for "gross negligence." They are not three peas in a pod; the votes were slightly different, and should have been. Their cases were related, but not exactly the same.

It would have been easy – but wrong – for the Senate to have washed its hands of these matters, leaving the allegations to be investigated solely by the RCMP. The Senate had to deal with what that Senate created.

What remains unresolved is the bigger story: the role of the Prime Minister's Office in ineffective, and sometimes heavy-handed, attempts to avoid embarrassment to the Conservative government. Stephen Harper himself has made varying, difficult-to-reconcile statements about his former chief of staff, Nigel Wright. The intentions surrounding at least two payments to Senator Duffy are as unclear as when they first emerged into daylight. The Senate addressed the matter of the inappropriately spending senators; Mr. Harper has not fully addressed the glaring questions about his office's role in the scandal.

Story continues below advertisement

The Senate haltingly, but in the end effectively, dealt with the expenses-claim controversy. It has set a precedent. And it's one that, we hope, will not need to be invoked for a long time to come.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct Licensing Options
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.