Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Why aboriginal people are underrepresented on juries

Frank Iacobucci, former Supreme Court justice and Independent Reviewer, speaks on his report on First Nations Representation on Ontario juries.

Brent Linton/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The underrepresentation of natives on Canadian juries is an issue with many dimensions. It emerges clearly from a report by Frank Iacobucci, a former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, published *on Tuesday, that the problem is the result not only of a lack of effort on the part of officials to obtain well-balanced juries but also of a reluctance by many aboriginals to take part in the court system, for which they feel a very understandable mistrust and alienation.

Mr. Iacobucci's review was commissioned by the attorney-general of Ontario, but essentially the same deficiencies and difficulties are found in other parts of Canada – as also in Australia and New Zealand – where aboriginals constitute a high proportion of the population.

The practice has often been to draw names for juror from municipal property-tax rolls, but residents of reserves are not municipal taxpayers in the first place. Moreover, reserves are often far away from the towns where the courthouses are.

Story continues below advertisement

Among the more insidious ways of excluding aboriginals from active participation is the ease with which lawyers – especially prosecutors, when the defendant is a native – can reject potential jurors by a "peremptory challenge," that is, without any specific objection. Although the word "systemic" can be a slippery one, Mr. Iacobucci's conclusion that the justice system is systemically biased against natives is reasonable.The report does not offer quick solutions, but rather such measures as the persistent harvesting of names from a variety of government sources, including health-care cards and drivers' licences, as well as continuing committees and an assistant deputy attorney-general dedicated to the whole issue.

One of Mr. Iacobucci's more encouraging and interesting findings is that many natives would be quite willing to take part as jurors on coroner's inquests, though they may be reluctant to do so in criminal trials; they prefer to discover and understand causes of deaths and how to prevent them, rather than to draw conclusion that will lead to punishments.

Officials must be assiduous in making sure natives take an active part in juries, and natives should try to overcome their mistrust of the justice system.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct Licensing Options
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.