Skip to main content

The front-end, crash test of a 2011 Nissan Leaf.

AP Photo/Insurance the Institute for Highway Safety

Drivers of vehicles that do poorly in the side-impact crash tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety are three times as likely to die in a real-world left-side crash than drivers of vehicles that perform well, a an IIHS analysis reports.

"Vehicles with good side ratings provide occupants with far more protection than vehicles that do poorly in our test," says institute chief research officer David Zuby.

The IIHS says studies of frontal crashes have shown similar results.

Story continues below advertisement

Side-impact crashes accounted for 27 per cent of passenger vehicle occupant deaths in the United States in 2009, notes the IIHS. Such crashes, says the institute, can be particularly deadly because the sides of vehicles have relatively little space to absorb energy and shield occupants.

The institute's side crash test differs from the U.S. Government's in that the IIHS uses an SUV-like barrier, while the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration uses a lower barrier designed to mimic a passenger car.

There is also a difference in crash test dummies. Until recently, both dummies used in the U.S. government's side barrier test represented average-size men; the institute's side test has always used dummies representing small women or 12-year-old children, which naturally makes scoring well more difficult.

Report an error
About the Author
Senior writer, Globe Drive

In 25 years of covering the auto industry, Jeremy Cato has won more than two-dozen awards, including three times being named automotive journalist of the year. Jeremy was born in Montreal and grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.