Skip to main content

Why don't kids have to wear seat belts on school buses? If they have to wear seat belts in cars (smaller kids even need special booster seats), common sense suggests they should have to wear them on the school bus too. — Dan, Toronto.

The people on the bus go up and down in a crash — but they're still safer than in an ordinary car with seat belts, said Transport Canada.

"Transport Canada and the provinces do not require school buses to have seat belts," Roxane Marchand, senior media advisor with the agency, said in an email statement. "This is because compartmentalization — high-backed seats that are padded and closely spaced together — protects passengers in a crash."

Story continues below advertisement

There were 3,684 injuries and 11 deaths in crashes on school buses in Canada between 2003 to 2012, Transport Canada notes in their National Collision Database.

In the same period, there were nearly 1.34 million injuries and 22,397 deaths in crashes on Canadian roads in all other vehicles.

"Transport Canada has not deemed seat belts to be mandatory, and basically their rationale is that the school bus safety record is so excellent," said David Carroll, Legislation and Safety Consultant to the Ontario School Bus Association (OSBA). "A child is 16 times safer riding to school in a school bus than riding to school in a family car."

School buses are safe

Buses get in fewer accidents than normal vehicles and when they do crash, there are fewer injuries, Carroll said.

"They're highly visible and we have more skilled and better trained drivers," Carroll said. "And you have a vehicle that sits higher than other traffic — when most vehicles hit a school bus, they collide below the floor line."

When a bus is hit from the front or the rear, kids are protected by the compartment — sort of like the way Christmas tree ornaments are protected in their boxes by those paper dividers.

Story continues below advertisement

"It doesn't require students to do anything other than sit in the seat with their legs ahead of them and not in the aisle," he said. "There's not a lot of room between seats and that's to reduce acceleration in a collision."

But that only works as long as kids stay in the compartment — so it's a problem if the bus rolls over," Carroll said. "And it's doesn't necessarily protect from a side impact."

Kids are actually in more danger around a school bus than on it, Carroll said.

"Kids get hit by other cars walking to or from the bus," he said. "Or they enter the danger zone and get hit by the bus because the driver can't see them." In the U.S. from 2003 to 2012, there were 244 pedestrians killed in school-transportation-related crashes — 195 were hit by school buses and 48 were hit by other vehicles. In that same ten-year period, 60 passengers were killed on school buses.

Seat belts require stiffer seats

So if kids are safe on buses now, wouldn't seat belts make them even safer?

Story continues below advertisement

Not necessarily, Carroll said. If there are seat belts on a school bus, Transport Canada recommends three-point belts — the harness and lap belt combination seen in most cars. But seats would have to be redesigned to have stiffer seat backs to support the shoulder belts.

"With firmer seat backs, you no longer have the same protection in that compartment," Carroll said. "So any kids who aren't wearing seat belts won't be as protected in a crash as they are now."

And, somebody would have to make sure kids are wearing their seat belts — and that the belts are adjusted to fit the child properly.

"It's possible to have a panel of lights that shows who's not wearing their belts, but that would contribute to driver distraction," Carroll said. "You could have an aide on each bus — but money for all this has to come from somewhere, so you might end up with fewer school buses on the roads and some kids left taking less safe ways to get to school."

No plans to change the rules — yet

Transport Canada decides what safety equipment is required on vehicles. In the case of seat belts, the provinces decide whether or not you have to wear them.

Story continues below advertisement

While Transport Canada doesn't require seat belts on any school bus, individual school districts are free to install belts in existing buses or to buy buses already equipped with seat belts, Carroll said.

"You're not breaking the law if you do install seat belts, but it raises issue with enforcement," Carroll said. "In some provinces, if students under 16 aren't wearing their seat belts, the driver can get the ticket."

Since 2007, Transport Canada has required that 10 per cent of seats on new school buses have to have a latch for child seats for smaller children.

"They're recommended for kids who are up to four and a half years old or 18 kg," Carroll said. "But there's no provincial requirement to use child seats that I'm aware of."

In the U.S., the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) has required three-point seat belts on newly built minibuses — the smaller school buses under 4,500 kg — since 2011. It doesn't mandate belts on bigger school buses.

Next year, NHTSA will be requiring seat belts on all newly built motor coaches, like the ones used by Greyhound, sold in the U.S. — Transport Canada says it's drafting regulations to follow suit.

Those new rules don't affect school buses — but that could eventually change.

This month, the new head of NHTSA, convened a group to study whether seat belts should be mandatory on all school buses.

Even if school buses don't ever have seat belts, there are still ways to make them safer, Carroll said.

"I would hate the message to be 'We haven't had a death in Ontario since 2007 so we can't improve the system,'" he said. "We shouldn't have any fatalities at all — it's up to Transport Canada to continue to look at this and move forward with any innovation they see fit."

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Instagram

Add us to your circles

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter