Skip to main content

Driverless Tuk-Tuks and rickshaws the next logical step in many major cities

Our Prototypes column introduces new vehicle concepts and presents visuals from designers who illustrate the ideas. Some of them will be extensions of existing concepts, others will be new, some will be production ready, and others really far-fetched.

The concept

The Urban Link is a driverless 'tuk-tuk' powered by natural gas. It's a vision for a new type of clean people mover that could be used in cities across the world.

Story continues below advertisement

The background

When you travel to Thailand, India, China, and countless other countries, you can hop on modified scooters (called auto rickshaws or Tuk-Tuks), which are retrofitted to seat two passengers and the driver. Tourists like them because it is possible to hop on and off plus they are cheap, the process is simple, and they are ubiquitous.

Urban Link Charles Bombardier Charles Bombardier

What will happen to them when driverless technology becomes widely available and stricter emission rules are passed? With the Urban Link, Boris Schwarzer and I tried to imagine a concept that would be cleaner, more efficient, and still simple to use.

How it works

The Urban Link would use a conventional four-stroke engine powered by propane gas (or LBG) because it's cleaner than regular gasoline (See the Pegasi concept) and it's much easier to refill or recharge than an electric car. When the tanks are almost empty, the vehicles would stop at a station where the LNG canisters would be changed manually or with an automated system in less than a minute. An electric version could also be developed if the charging infrastructure is available.

The width of the Urban Link is designed to seat four average adults in a 2+2 configuration, side-by-side and facing each other. However, some people require more room, so the Urban Link's interior could also be used as a 1 + 1 vehicle. The rear-facing seat could also be flipped up to store and secure luggage, groceries, or a dog. Passengers would enter through wide side openings by using an automated flip-down step located along the lower frame.

Story continues below advertisement

If you are commuting in a driverless vehicle, why bother with a windshield? The Urban Link wouldn't have one; instead it would feature an upper spar (tubular frame) to increase its rigidity and support its transparent panoramic roof. Passengers would still have an excellent outside view by looking through the side openings and the roof.

The ordering and payment system would be similar to what UBER has developed and require a smartphone to find, order, and pay for your ride.

What it's used for

The Urban Link is similar to the Spike concept. The big question we are facing is how our vehicles will evolve if we no longer need to drive them? Schwarzer and I tried to think about this question applied to short-distance urban travel, and we are proposing the Urban Link, powered by LNG or Electricity, as one possibility.

We know there is a demand for such vehicles as they are being used daily in hundreds of cities across the globe. Driverless technology is almost ready, and the ordering and payment software exists, so an Urban Link vehicle is the next logical step.

The Designer

Story continues below advertisement

I would like to thank Boris Schwarzer who created the renderings of the Urban Link and who contributed to the whole concept (He even came up with the name). He is based in Michigan and attended the College of Creative Studies. He also created the images for the Spike commuting car, the Kübe Car-Condo concept and the Joust personal transporter.

Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Instagram

Add us to your circles

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter