Skip to main content

Jaguar F-Type convertible

Jaguar

Jaguar and its Land Rover sibling are hiring so many new employees here in Coventry that, well, the walk into headquarters and the factory from the parking lot is quite a hike. There just isn't enough parking on the main grounds.

This is what happens when you're a car company whose Jaguar brand alone saw sales surge 42 per cent globally in 2013, with Canadian sales up a stunning 96 per cent. Jaguar Land Rover sales overall last year were up 19 per cent to 425,006. And annual profits are now in the billions.

This month Jaguar is showcasing its new F-Type Coupe, which follows the launch of the F-Type Convertible last year. And this duo comes after the introduction of all-wheel drive to Jaguar's lineup, which in large part explains the big jump in Jag sales in Canada. Coming in 2015 is a small sedan built on an all-new aluminum flexible platform. We're seeing an impressive array of new models and technologies in a very small window for Jag.

Story continues below advertisement

"Now we're in the stage of increasing the relevance of the brand," says Rob Filipovic, head of Jaguar product management in North America.

Jaguar is doing what was impossible under the previous owner, Ford Motor, which sold JLR to India's Tata conglomerate in 2009. That is, Jaguar is growing and making money.

When Tata bought JLR, I suggested that my back-of-the-envelope calculation showed that Ford had spent $50-billion on Jag over 20 years of ownership, without ever turning an annual profit. Not once.

"So why is Jaguar growing and making money with Tata?" asked my cousin, Michael Cato, who lives in the British Midlands less than an hour away from JLR headquarters, which means he naturally takes a keen interest in the local business. As a guest in his house, I had to conjure up some sort of answer.

And it's this: Ford, a mainstream auto maker with a truly global footprint, focused on fitting Jaguar into Ford. The "cowboys" at Ford, as JLR insides refer to them, roared in with loads of money and a swaggering confidence.

On the plus side, Ford did an amazing job of reinventing JLR's manufacturing facilities and processes. Indeed, JLR types willingly say they'd not be around at all today without the Ford money and expertise. But on the product side, Ford looked for ways to spread costs right across Ford's product lineup, the global one.

Thus, the Ford Mondeo in Europe spawned the Jaguar X-Type small sedan. Everyone could see the X-Type was a gussied-up Mondeo, despite the all-wheel drive and wood trim. It was a disaster and an embarrassment.

Story continues below advertisement

How does this sort of thing happen? One Jag insider told me that when Ford's big bosses in Dearborn, Mich., put Jaguar on the agenda at headquarters, JLR was item 22 or 23. JLR, then, had to fit into and around items 1-21.

Under Tata, JLR is a top priority, No. 1 or 2 at every corporate meeting. The new Tata ownership had plenty of management and even automotive experience when they took over, but they freely admitted they knew nothing about luxury vehicles. So they turned the business over to a JLR management group that focused on building a premium lineup of cars and light trucks without the burden of finding synergies with the likes of a Ford Mondeo. Tata provided capital and overall direction, but JLR was charged with reinventing itself without any of the cowboy-like advice that had been commonplace under Ford.

JLR doesn't have to fit into Tata Motors in the same way it was pressured to under Ford. In fact, JLR for the present is making gobs of money for Tata Motors – profits the likes of which Ford never saw during its run as owner. Surely there are people at Ford now who look on with amazement and perhaps a big dose of consternation.

If you have questions about driving or car maintenance, please contact our experts at globedrive@globeandmail.com.

Follow us on Twitter @Globe_Drive.

Add us to your circles.

Story continues below advertisement

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter