Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Land Rover now worth considering due to input from Indian owner

2013 Land Rover LR2

Land Rover

Overall Rating
The LR2 now has the right price and it certainly make an authentic statement if you’re an SUV owner. But the quality scores remain an issue.You’ll like this vehicle if: you want a real compact SUV at a fair price.
Looks Rating
This is a boxy rig with big windows, but aside from the fancy headlights, nothing here is particularly eye-grabbing.
Interior Rating
Very nice. A huge improvement. The touch screen controls are functional and the cabin looks like a $40,000 cabin should.
Ride Rating
A tall and off-road-capable rig, so naturally the highway ride, particularly on windy days, feels like you’re in a rig with a tall centre of gravity. That said, the LR2 is the real deal in terms of its ability to ford streams, tackle snow and navigate muddy bogs.
Safety Rating
From its seven airbags to the electronic aids and the five-start European crash test rating, the LR2 is solid.
Green Rating
We’re still waiting for the final fuel numbers, but this cannot be the most fuel-efficient in its class – not with the weight of off-road abilities and that boxy shape.

I was thinking about Ratan Tata the other day and it was not a random event.

Tata crept into my thoughts because without him, Jaguar Land Rover would either be long gone from the marketplace or in the hands of, I don't know, some crazy Russian oligarch with gobs of cash.

In any case, it's doubtful that Land Rover would have done such a nice renovation of the 2013 LR2 without him. So when I drove it, I began channelling Tata. Ratan Tata, of course, championed the effort by India's Tata Motors to acquire Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford in 2008. Bold? No, audacious.

Story continues below advertisement

Tata, a structural engineer by training, retired from the family business, Tata Industries Ltd., in December at age 75. He left behind a $100-billion company, with holdings as far flung as Tetley Tea and Ritz-Carlton Hotels.

But insiders at JLR tell me it's British car brands that fascinate him. He's known to take deep dives into the JLR design studios in the British Midlands, spending hours poking about the creative types. Moreover, Tata comes across as wonderfully unpretentious for a billionaire. In a recent Automotive News interview, he discussed future plans for JLR – noting that the company won't repeat the mistakes Ford made with the X-Type.

In response to a question about buying JLR, Tata pointed out that "two or three months" after the purchase, along came the "financial collapse" "and everybody said: 'You stupid people, who would go and acquire this company that is already struggling and you will bankrupt your entire group as a result?' It looked a little scary at that time. But it's completely changed. People are not saying we are smart, but they aren't saying we are stupid, either."

He went on to explain why Tata risked so much to fund products like this renovated LR2, even as the world's economy shuddered: "If we had not put money into it, the company would have amputated itself in many ways to stay alive. And one of the ways it would have stayed alive was to cut new product development."

All is not perfect, but at least JLR is making money and sales were up 29 per cent through the second quarter. Nonetheless, Land Rover must improve its quality scores in influential research from the likes of J.D. Power and Associated and Consumer Reports. Hovering around the bottom of quality studies is not a long-term recipe for success – not when your competition includes the biggest, richest, most powerful car companies in the world.

The LR2 is aimed at the Audi Q5, BMW X3, Volvo's XC60 and even Land Rover's own Range Rover Evoque. Aside from the new engine, redesigned interior and revised bodywork, what stands out most is the pricing. The 2013 base LR2 is going for $39,990. JLR president Lindsay Duffield says it was critical to get the entry point below $40,000 in Canada – especially so given the five-door Evoque starts at $46,995. There needs to be a noteworthy price gap between the two smaller Land Rover rigs and now there is.

Of course, you can load up the LR2 with extras and, if you do, you'll drive the price to $50,000 or so. But even the most basic LR2 gets the Ford-sourced 240-horsepower, 2.0-litre, turbocharged, four-cylinder. Thank goodness, too.

Story continues below advertisement

What's known at Ford as an EcoBoost engine replaces the clunky, thirsty 3.2-litre inline-six that had its roots in old Volvos. That six feels ponderous compared to the responsive four-banger. The new engine is efficient and torquey (250 lb-ft), which is what you want in a small SUV.

Just as important as the new powertrain is the refinished interior. Some of you may have liked the rugged and unrefined look of the old LR2, but not enough of you. The new cabin design includes a handsome dashboard, car-like trim bits, a standard seven-inch colour touch screen, a useful centre console and, if you're willing to pay $2,000 for it, an 825-watt Meridian surround sound system with 17 speakers (a 380-watt Meridian system is standard). Voice controls are also available, packaged with the $2,000 navigation system. Exterior upgrades are more subtle, but take a long look at the lights up front and you'll see a notable difference.

Whichever LR2 you pick, standard fare includes leather-covered electric seats, dual sunroofs and the usual power-operated goodies. That and various safety items are standard (seven airbags, roll control, stability control and a five-star European crash test rating, for instance).

Before the upgrades and the price cut, I would never have recommended an LR2. But now, even with those miserable Land Rover quality scores, I'd suggest giving Ratan Tata a tip of the hat and at least a road test if this rig suits your needs. If nothing else, when you dip into the JLR world, you get a great story.

Tech specs

2013 Land Rover LR2

Story continues below advertisement

Type: Compact SUV

Base Price: $39,990 (freight $1,270)

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder, turbocharged

Horsepower/torque: 240 hp/250 lb-ft

Transmission: Six-speed automatic

Drive: All-wheel

Fuel economy (litres/100 km): not available; premium recommended

Alternatives: Audi Q5, BMW X3, Volvo's XC60, Range Rover Evoque, Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class, Lexus RX, Acura RDX

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to