Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's new budget bill was tabled Thursday. (File photo)

AARON VINCENT ELKAIM/THE CANADIAN PRESS

British Columbia is interested in participating in a revived effort to create a national securities regulator, but is telling federal officials a new model would have to be structured differently to respect provincial jurisdiction over securities regulation.

Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced in his budget Thursday that Ottawa is again exploring whether there is provincial support for another attempt to create a national regulator to oversee Canada's securities sector. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in December that proposed federal legislation was unconstitutional and infringed on provincial jurisdiction, leaving uncertainty about whether the long-time effort to create a national regulator would be abandoned.

Since the December ruling, federal officials and members of the Canadian Securities Transition Office – a body created by Mr. Flaherty to develop a new national regulator – have crisscrossed the country speaking to provincial officials about whether a new model can be created that could win support.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Flaherty said Friday he "won't guess" what his chances are of winning support, but said the government is willing to try again.

"I can tell you this, a number of provinces, including some of the larger provinces, have had continuing discussions with the federal government in light of the Supreme Court of Canada decision … I'm modestly encouraged by the discussions that we're having so far."

An official from the B.C. Ministry of Finance said the province supports the concept of creating a national regulator, but its support depends on creating a different model that respects constitutional jurisdictions, improves enforcement and "responds to regional economies" such as B.C.'s venture capital market.

"We think a national regulator is still possible if provinces and the federal government are interested," the official said Friday.

Ottawa has been willing to move ahead with the idea even if all provinces do not opt to join the new regulator. Ontario has been the staunchest supporter of the proposal, and was the only province to side with the federal government in the Supreme Court hearing last year.

Quebec is likely to remain the strongest holdout to any revived plan. Finance Minister Raymond Bachand issued a statement Thursday saying he "does not understand why the federal government is persisting in its efforts" to create a national regulator despite the top court ruling.

Toronto securities lawyer Philip Anisman said he believes the Supreme Court decision left a lot of scope to create a national regulator. The model most often discussed would see provinces retain jurisdiction over securities, but "delegate" the work to a national body. This would not require provinces to cede control over the sector, and they would still have their own provincial securities acts rather than be governed by a national act.

Story continues below advertisement

"There's lots of room for the feds to continue to pursue this," Mr. Anisman said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies