Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A Research in Motion (RIM) BlackBerry 9900 smartphone handset is pictured next to an Apple iPhone in this illustration picture taken in Lavigny, July 21, 2012.

VALENTIN FLAURAUD/Reuters

New research commissioned by Research In Motion Ltd. says it is often cheaper and more secure for companies to continue using BlackBerrys despite the waning popularity of the device in an era when consumers more broadly prefer using iPhones or Android devices.

Companies are increasingly adopting so-called "Bring you own device" (BYOD) policies as the aging fleets of BlackBerrys traditionally deployed by large corporations are gradually supplemented, or in some cases replaced, by Apple Inc.'s more popular iPhone and a variety of devices running Google Inc.'s Android software.

But Strategy Analytics, a global research and consulting firm, was asked by RIM to look into the costs associated with an organization that switches devices and found that costs often increase, despite the savings of not having to pay for and provide phones to employees.

Story continues below advertisement

"In summary, Strategy Analytics found that the costs of utilising the BlackBerry solution not only provided the most secure platform, but also the lowest (total cost of ownership) when considering all elements of the network, required device management and the devices themselves," the firm wrote in its report, released on Monday.

In the first year of BYOD deployment in a firm with 100 people, according to Strategy Analytics, it would cost 39 per cent more than using BlackBerrys, and roughly 14 per cent more in subsequent years – due largely to increased IT support and the requirement to purchase security software from third-party mobile device management companies. Despite the fact that BlackBerry consumer plans often use less data and can be cheaper than other smartphone plans, the research firm did point out that BlackBerry "enterprise" plans for corporate users are often more expensive, and that RIM's support services also often cost more.

Strategy Analysts also says that a "single supplier providing an end-to-end architecture" is more secure than deploying a variety of devices. Past interviews with Canadian wireless executives, though, suggests that other platforms such as Android are often secure enough, given the increasingly large gap in functionality between older and even current BlackBerry models and some of the newest devices, from companies such as Samsung, running Android.

RIM, of course, has a big stake in convincing companies not to switch from using BlackBerrys. Corporate users are incredibly valuable to the company and are an influential core part of RIM's user base – which, after years of rapid gains, has slowed to around 80 million global users. But in developed economies, the era of business people carrying two phones – one for work and one for personal use – is beginning to dwindle as companies increasingly offer employees the choice of what device to use. RIM, desperate to remain at the core of big companies' IT policies, launched a service called BlackBerry Mobile Fusion that helps IT departments management more than just BlackBerrys.

Tyler Lessard, a former RIM executive who now works for Fixmo Inc., a third-party mobile device management company that competes with RIM, says RIM is likely correct about savings that come from the status quo – sticking with BlackBerry. But he adds that companies need to weigh more than just the hard dollar amount because decisions about which mobile devices employees can use can impact productivity.

"There could be a cost saving because you're not buying all these devices, and yeah, you may not get bulk rates on your data plans with carriers," he said. "But when you look at it from the other side, companies are saying there's huge productivity gains to be had by letting our employees use iPads and iPhones and Androids ... it's not a should I do it (implement a BYOD policy) or not, it's I have to do it, now how do I not compromise security?"

RIM, which still sees strong growth in many emerging markets, fell out of a top five ranking of global smartphone makers for the first time in July, according to research firm IDC. The firm says RIM gradually slipped from nearly 20 per cent of the world's smartphone market to 6.7 per cent, before falling out of the top five entirely.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies