Skip to main content

Canada has the highest percentage of actively managed ETFs in the G7, with this type of fund representing 13.7 per cent of total ETF assets.

istockphoto

Canada is leading the charge in actively managed exchange-traded funds and will continue to see growth as bigger players are set to launch active funds.

Unlike a traditional ETF that follows a certain index, actively managed ETFs are more like mutual funds, with their own dedicated portfolio management.

Canada has the highest percentage of actively managed ETFs in the G7, with this type of fund representing 13.7 per cent of total ETF assets, compared with just 1 per cent in the U.S. market, as of Dec. 31, according to data compiled by National Bank Financial.

Story continues below advertisement

One reason for the lack of actively managed assets in the United States compared with Canada is the difference in how the two countries regulate ETFs.

In Canada, ETFs follow the same portfolio disclosure rules as mutual funds – which include releasing quarterly top 20 holdings and semi-annual full portfolio holdings in its interim and annual financials – information that is publicly available through a fund's website and fund documents, say Steve Hawkins, co-CEO of Horizons ETFs Management (Canada) Inc.

But U.S. ETF providers are required to offer full transparency in how the ETF fund is managed, by publicly disclosing the fund's daily holdings. For an active manager, that could mean disclosing proprietary information, such as sector allocations or stock picks.

"For an ETF – similar to a mutual fund, the day-to-day decisions that a portfolio manager is making to the investment composition of a strategy is less relevant to the investor at the end of the day as … buying or selling that strategy," Mr. Hawkins says. "It is not material information that would affect their buying or selling decision for the ETF or mutual fund."

The Canadian ETF industry ended the year with $89.5-billion in total ETF assets. Canada's growth in the active management space also stems from Canada's financial advisory community, says Barry Gordon, president and CEO of First Asset Capital Corp.

"Many financial advisers think of the world in active terms so they understand that through active portfolio management they can reduce volatility and increase better risk-adjusted returns over all – so it's an investment solution that they will migrate towards," Mr. Gordon says.

In 2015, many investors turned to active-managed fixed-income strategies, including bond ETFs and preferred shares ETFs.

Story continues below advertisement

The amount of actively managed assets shifting into the Canadian ETF market will continue to rise in 2016 as several large mutual fund players announced plans to enter the industry with actively managed products.

Both Toronto-Dominion Bank and Mackenzie Financial announced plans to launch proprietary actively managed ETF offerings in 2016. (TD Asset Management will also offer a passive fund family of ETFs.)

Last fall, CI Financial scooped up First Asset – which manages $450-million in 10 actively managed funds.

The increase of active players could be good news for those investors seeking out cheaper alternatives.

"It's inevitable that new players will drive the costs of ETFs down over all," Mr. Gordon says. "It will also help level the playing field between simple ETFs and active strategies – including both rules-based and discretionary portfolio management."

The growth of actively managed funds could start to rise south of the border as U.S. regulators continue to look at the actively managed ETF space.

Story continues below advertisement

"In the U.S., there have been several active ETF applications in the works for many years and they are regularly visited," Mr. Hawkins says.

"The U.S. regulators are not very far down the road with respect to active ETFs, but I believe they will eventually get there."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter