Skip to main content

A return to volatility in the stock market has investors jumping into financial products that promise a smoother ride.

The steady increase in the size of daily swings in the S&P 500 since late November has sent $2-billion (U.S.) into exchange-traded funds designed to lessen volatility. That's a 15-per-cent rise in assets in the first five weeks of the year. And so far, the ETFs are all beating the markets they track.

These low-volatility ETFs are one of the most successful categories under what's called the "smart-beta" umbrella. "Smart beta" is the buzz phrase used to describe ETFs that screen or weight the stocks in their portfolios on such things as dividends, sales, or volatility. That veers from the standard practice of weighting a portfolio by market capitalization. There are 15 of these ETFs, with $16-billion in assets. This type of product didn't exist five years ago.

Story continues below advertisement

The appeal of the low-volatility approach is the promise to take the edge off investing in everything from large caps, midcaps, small caps, emerging markets, and developed markets. These ETFs hold stocks that have smaller price swings than those in the broad market. That means the stocks in their portfolios won't go up as much as other stocks in a rally, but they also won't fall as hard as others in a drop.

There are two main kinds of these low-stress ETFs. The fairly simple version is the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio (SPLV-N). The $5.6-billion ETF holds the 100 least volatile stocks in the S&P 500-stock index and gives the highest weightings to the stocks with the least volatility. This leaves the fund with a massive concentration in one or two sectors, typically utilities or industrials. Right now, though, financial stocks have the biggest weighting, at 33 per cent. SPLV charges investors 0.25 per cent in annual fees.

The more complicated version of this product is the $4.5-billion iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ETF (USMV-N). This one is aimed at investors who want a low-volatility version of the broad stock market but want more standard sector weightings. To do this and keep overall volatility low, USMV tries to pick a portfolio of stocks whose movements neutralize each other. Its financial sector allocation is 16 per cent, in line with popular indices such as the S&P 500. The ETF charges 0.15 per cent in annual fees.

So far, low-volatility ETFs have delivered on their promise to provide a smoother ride in a low-cost, convenient package. SPLV and USMV are both less volatile than the markets they track. Without going into wonky volatility statistics, they're both about 15 per cent less volatile than the S&P 500. They've also returned about the same as the S&P 500: In the past two years, USMV and SPLV are both up 60 per cent, compared with 62 per cent for the S&P 500.

In short, these ETFs will go up less, and down less, than the market they track. A recent example of how that plays out is from the summer of 2011. Back then, the European debt crisis rattled U.S. stocks, and the S&P 500 lost 11 per cent. SPLV lost just 5 per cent. The flipside? In 2013, when the stock market was on fire and the S&P 500 returned 33 per cent, SPLV had a 23-per-cent return.

One area where low-volatility ETFs have had sustained success beating the broad market is in emerging markets. Emerging markets have been shaky, to say the least, over the past few years, with investors moving toward safer stocks. Against that backdrop, the iShares Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility ETF (EEMV-N) is up 15 per cent in the past three years; the iShares Emerging Markets ETF (EEM-N) is down 2 per cent. If there is a big rally in emerging markets, however, EEM will outperform its low-volatility peer.

That leads to a good rule of thumb on all smart-beta ETFs: Convenience is guaranteed, and outperformance is a bonus. Investors who will be upset if their ETF is up only 15 per cent while the market is up 23 per cent shouldn't buy these products. But if an investor is OK with a smaller upside in exchange for a smoother ride and less pain when stocks fall, these products can be good shock absorbers.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter