Skip to main content

China's demand for commodities is well known, as the country devours everything from copper to nickel to oil to develop its economy. Now, you can include gold in that list.

Gold enthusiasts have long seen China as a growth opportunity for their beloved metal, with the theory that rising affluence amid distrust of banks and concerns about inflation would encourage consumers to buy gold as a hedge. And the usual metrics used for anything involving China were, of course, attractive: If a billion people bought just a sliver of gold each, the demand on the world's limited gold supplies would send prices sharply higher.

According to the World Gold Council, China is now delivering on this promise, overtaking Indian buyers as the world's biggest consumers of gold in the first quarter of 2011. From Dow Jones: "China's investment demand for gold more than doubled to 90.9 metric tons in the first three months of the year, outpacing India's modest rise to 85.6 tons, the World Gold Council said in its quarterly report on Thursday. China now accounts for 25 per cent of gold investment demand, compared with India's 23 per cent."

Story continues below advertisement

The shift in numbers is dramatic. As the Dow Jones article points out, as recently as 2007 India's gold demand accounted for 61 per cent of the world's total. China's demand was just 9 per cent.

The development comes at an interesting time for gold. Earlier this week, George Soros reported in a regulatory filing that he had sold most of his gold holdings in the SPDR Gold Trust exchange traded fund in the first quarter, a time that roughly coincides with gold's remarkable rise above $1,500 (U.S.) an ounce. On Friday in late-morning trading at $1,494 an ounce, up about $2.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.