Skip to main content

Investors are taking in stride the deep cuts in U.S. military spending proposed by President Barack Obama on Thursday. The S&P 500 aerospace and defense industry group of 12 stocks was down 0.7 per cent in late afternoon trading, putting the group about a percentage point behind the benchmark index.

However, Boeing Co. , General Dynamics , Lockheed Martin and Raytheon were down more than 1 per cent each.

The reaction could have been a lot worse, of course. The Obama administration announced military cuts of $487-billion (U.S.) over the next decade as it strives to balance the need for widespread spending cutbacks against the need for military preparedness.

Story continues below advertisement

In his speech, Mr. Obama appeared to hit the right notes, suggesting that a leaner military doesn't mean weak: "Our military will be leaner, but the world must know the United States is going to maintain our military superiority with armed forces that are agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and threats," he said.

Despite the market's collective shrug over the cutbacks, they deliver a bookend to what had been more than a decade of strong performance by aerospace and defense stocks. Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the industry group has delivered total returns of 159 per cent, or more than three-times the gains by the broader S&P 500 over the same period (after factoring in dividends).

If those gains coincided with rising military spending, backed up by two major wars, it will be interesting to see what relative peace and lower spending does to the group over the next 10 years.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter