Skip to main content

Some strategists have pointed out that stocks look attractive next to bonds for the simple reason that dividend yields are higher than U.S. government bond yields. In other words, why waste your time on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yielding 2.8 per cent right now when you can buy the SPDR S&P dividend exchange traded fund , which yields 3.4 per cent?

However, Swiss private wealth managers Lombard Odier (via FT Alphaville) point out that this strategy isn't all it's cracked up to be. Yes, the so-called dividend yield gap (the gap between U.S. stock yields and bond yields) has turned positive. But history shows that this isn't a more profitable strategy than buying stocks when stocks are yielding less than bonds.

The management firm based their conclusions on data going back to 1953, and formed their conclusions using five-year total returns (ie, including dividends) for the S&P 500. They got similar results using one-year and five-year returns.

Story continues below advertisement

"It is vital to buy nothing more than what is cheap today - namely dividends - and not hastily draw the conclusion that the dividend yield gap is a measure of equity valuation…," they said. You can find more about this, along with a nifty chart, at FT Alphaville (link above).

Report an error
About the Author
Investing Reporter

David Berman has been writing about business and investing since 1995. He has written for a number of magazines, including Canadian Business and MoneySense. He worked at the Financial Post as an investing writer and daily columnist before moving to the Globe and Mail in 2008. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.