Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Does your adviser have your back on cutting investment fees?

A standard investment industry putdown of robo-advisers is that they lack the human touch.

But if human advisers care so much about their clients, why aren't they doing more to reduce the fees that clients pay to own the investments in their portfolio? There's good reason to ask this question after the robo-adviser Nest Wealth announced last week that it has updated the list of exchange-traded funds it uses for client portfolios in a way that will reduce fees by an average 28 per cent.

There are fee-conscious investment advisers out there. One of them contacted me last week to complain how one of the mutual fund companies he uses has adjusted pricing for high net worth clients in a way that could actually make them pay more. But if I had to rate the fee sensitivity of advisers on behalf of clients overall, I give them a 2 out of 10. This is based on the billions of dollars sitting in over-priced mutual funds.

Story continues below advertisement

Clients of robo-advisers pay a modest fee to have their portfolios managed, plus additional costs for the ETFs used in those portfolios. The more robos can squeeze their fees, the more attractive they are as an alternative to traditional advisers. The advice fee can only be reduced so far in an industry that is still struggling for profitability. This leaves ETF costs as the best option for lowering costs to clients.

Nest's new lineup is a model of simple, low-cost investing. Funds from the BMO, iShares and Vanguard families are used, all with management expense ratios ranging from 0.05 per cent at the low end to 0.39 per cent at the high end.

Nest says that if clients' fees are lower, their portfolios can grow larger. I'd like to be able to say this is so basic as to be laughable. But in the traditional advisory business, fees are too often glossed over or ignored. High-cost products are sold when comparable or better low-cost alternatives are available. Sometimes it's greed – the high fee products may pay better commissions. And sometimes it's laziness or ignorance.

The human touch in the investment advice biz means giving a darn about how much your clients pay to invest.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Personal Finance Columnist

Rob Carrick has been writing about personal finance, business and economics for close to 20 years. He joined The Globe and Mail in late 1996 as an investment reporter and has been personal finance columnist since November 1998. Rob's personal finance columns appear in The Globe on Tuesday and Thursday, and his Portfolio Strategy column for investors appears on Saturday. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨