Skip to main content

During most of the past year, when economic data pointed to a U.S. economic recovery, only the hardcore bears would suggest that a double-dip recession was in the works. Now, the U.S. Federal Reserve is weighing the possibility that the economy could sputter.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the Fed - which only recently said that the odds of a double dip recession were unlikely - is quietly debating what they can do if the economy takes a turn for the worse or inflation continues to decline.

"Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has played down the risk of a double-dip recession and signaled guarded confidence in the recovery," the Wall Street Journal reported. "But fiscal woes in Europe, stock-market declines at home and stubbornly high U.S. unemployment have alerted some officials to risks that the economy could lose momentum and that inflation, already running below the Fed's informal target of 1.5 per cent to 2 per cent, could fall further, raising a risk of price deflation."

Story continues below advertisement

So what can the Fed do, with its key interest rate already parked at about 0 per cent? The Journal mentions three potential moves: Reinvesting cash from maturing mortgage bond in new bonds; buy more mortgage bonds and debt; and make it very clear that the key lending rate - expected by some observers to rise later this year - is going nowhere.

Economists at UBS recently pushed back their expectations for the start of a Fed rate hike to January, 2011, from September, 2010.

Meanwhile, David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff (and yes, one of the hardcore bears mentioned above) believes that the Fed won't raise rates for a long, long time. Although he didn't give a date, he implies that a rate hike could be even further away.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.