Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Beleaguered Bombardier Inc. investors are being tested again.

Following a preliminary ruling from the U.S. Commerce Department on Tuesday night, Bombardier now faces punitive countervailing duties on planes imported into the United States.

The shares fell right on cue, tumbling 7.5 per cent on Wednesday. They closed in Toronto at $2.10, down 17 cents.

Story continues below advertisement

Bombardier slams 'absurd' 220% duties in Boeing trade feud

Britain's May 'bitterly disappointed' by Bombardier ruling

On a wing and a prayer: What analysts say about a wounded Bombardier

But for investors who don't mind taking a risk with an unpopular bet, there appears to be a good reason to side with Bombardier here: Its new C Series planes, apparently, are being noticed.

Bombardier's stock had already been battered by cost overruns and production delays associated with the development of its C Series planes, the fuel-efficient line of regional jets that Bombardier finally began to deliver about a year ago.

The stock has also been weighed down by a long list of other concerns. There was the company's request for government financial aid, the corruption investigation by Canadian and Swedish authorities, and the planned merger of Siemens AG and Alstom SA's rail operations, which raises questions about Bombardier's own rail division's ability to compete.

Now, faced with punishing U.S. duties on the new planes, the pain might not be over.

Story continues below advertisement

This latest setback, which began when mighty Boeing Co. complained earlier this year that it believed Bombardier received unfair subsidies on the sale of some C Series planes, raises questions about Bombardier's ability to make any progress on sales in the United States and elsewhere.

But Boeing's complaint and the Commerce Department's supportive ruling also suggests that the Canadian company has scored a significant victory with its new planes. Why else would Boeing even notice?

Let's start with the reaction to the C Series planes: By most accounts, fliers and airlines like the alternative to similar-sized planes made by Boeing and Airbus (737s and A320s, respectively).

In an article about mid-sized jets published earlier this year, The Economist – a neutral-enough source on this matter – said that airlines like the Bombardier planes because they are reliable and easy on fuel, while passengers appreciate the quiet and comfortable cabins. As well, the article suggests that Bombardier, despite costly production delays, is by no means behind rising competition from manufacturers outside the United States.

Sales of Russia's Sukhoi Superjets are lagging sales of the C Series planes, and are mostly confined to airlines in Russia. And Brazil's Embraer E2 planes aren't expected to enter service until 2018 at the earliest. Same goes for China's Comac planes.

Investors should also note that Bombardier's delivery of C Series planes is accelerating. Bombardier management expects the company will deliver about 30 aircraft in fiscal 2017, up from just three deliveries in the first quarter.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, there are 360 orders, as of June 30, and this backlog is growing. Bombardier shares bounced 6.1 per cent on Tuesday, following a report that the company is in talks with China's three largest airlines.

The success is starting to appear in some of Bombardier's financial numbers (if you're okay with numbers that are less concrete than, say, actual profit).

In its second-quarter results, released at the end of July, Bombardier reported an adjusted profit of 2 cents per share, its best quarterly showing in two years and well ahead of analysts' estimates.

As well, margins are growing fatter in the transportation unit, which is leading to greater confidence in management's full-year target for EBIT (or earnings before interest and taxes), a measure of profitability.

Does this add up to an obvious buying opportunity?

Umm, here's where the risks kick in.

Story continues below advertisement

Bombardier hasn't produced an annual profit since fiscal 2013. Without recent government financial help, the company may have failed.

And with respect to the Boeing complaint, it is unclear at this point the staying power of the Commerce Department's preliminary ruling (a final ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission is expected in 2018). The impact the ruling will have on U.S. C Series sales is also unclear.

But there's a reason to take a chance on this stock after it's been skewered: If Boeing sees the C Series planes as a competitive threat, then perhaps investors should do the same.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies