Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

2012 looks set to be an eventful year for Apple , with new CEO Tim Cook expected to launch a host of new products, including the iPhone 5, iPad 3 and the eagerly-anticipated Apple TV.

Many investors, though, are more preoccupied with Apple's vast $81.6-billion (U.S.) cash haul, particularly with Cook hinting that that he could open the company's wallet by making a strategic acquisition or even bringing back the dividend.

Apple has cash and investments worth $81.6-billion.

Story continues below advertisement

"There are two schools of thought," explained Michael Yoshikami, CEO of YCMNET Advisors. "The allocation of capital matters, but what really matters is that Apple is a growth company – what will really drive that forward are innovative products and chipping away at competitors' market share."

Yoshikami cites the new versions of the iPad, iPhone, and Apple TV as catalysts, and also predicts that Apple may bring iPad technology to the MacBook Air with improved screen resolution and touch pads.

All the signs certainly point to Apple enjoying a strong start to 2012, boosted by robust holiday season sales.

Longer term, though, some investors are questioning whether gadgets alone are enough to maintain Apple's stellar share growth of recent years.

"For the first time I can remember, I think a new stance on capital allocation would be just as strong of a catalyst for the stock going forward, than anything on the product front," explained Chad Brand, president of Peridot Capital Management and author of the Peridot Capitalist blog. "Apple has gotten large enough that investors have priced in the fact that they will dominate their markets – I don't think a company this size, even one as magical as Apple, can really surprise investors on the upside with sales of iPads or iPhones anymore."

Brand notes that everyone expects Apple gadgets to sell like "gangbusters" in 2012, and warns that even sexy new offerings such as Apple TV may not move the needle for the company's stock.

"Given that everything has essentially gone right for them in recent years, Wall Street is no longer affording the stock a premium valuation," he said. "How can they really surprise us on the product side in 2012? I doubt they can – TVs would be a large, new market, but that new product is the worst kept secret today (and already factored in by investors as a result)."

Story continues below advertisement

With a new sheriff (or, rather, CEO) in town, there are hopes that Apple may reverse its dividend stance sometime during the coming year.

The tech giant stopped paying dividends in 1995, opting to focus on growth at a time when it was facing stiff competition from the likes of Microsoft. Fast forward more than a decade and a half ahead, though, and Apple is the king of Silicon Valley, dwarfing its rivals with a colossal $353.28-billion market cap.

Cook's predecessor, Steve Jobs, had a long-standing aversion to dividends, preferring to keep hold of cash for potential acquisitions and "bold" investments.

"Now that Steve Jobs is gone, I want Tim Cook to modify/enhance these policies to position Apple to penetrate corporate markets," explained Apple shareholder Ernie Varitimos, who runs the Apple Investor Web site. "So, while I think Mr. Cook should hold in reverence the needs of the customer, he should also make Apple attractive to institutional investors by offering a dividend."

"Since the days of premium valuations are over, doing something with that cash balance would jolt the stock as much, if not more, than a strong quarterly earnings report," added Peridot's Brand. "Why they insist on doing nothing is beyond me."

Cook was recently quizzed by analysts on the possibility of a dividend or share buyback. Speaking during Apple's fourth-quarter conference call, the CEO hinted that while the money "isn't burning a hole" in his pocket, he could be open to revisiting the company's cash strategy.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm not religious about holding cash or not holding it," explained Cook. "We will continue to ask ourselves what's in Apple's best interest – it's a topic for the board on an ongoing basis."

With tech heavyweights such as Cisco and Microsoft eventually caving to investors' dividend demands, though, Cook will face more questions on this topic during the next 12 months. There has also been chatter that Apple may open up its coffers for M&A.

"What I think we could see is an acquisition of some sort – I continue to believe that Apple will get into the streaming business," added YCMNET's Yoshikami. This, he explained, could center on content for Apple products.

There have already been rumors, for example, that the Cupertino, Calif.-based firm would make a move for online video service Hulu.

Ultimately, though, the sheer size of Apple's cash hoard opens up plenty of options for the gadget maker, according to Yoshikami. "I think that we could see some sort of dividend, but I don't think it's going to be enough to seriously impact Apple's cash position," he said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies