Skip to main content

The Bay Street sign is pictured in the heart of the financial district as people walk by in Toronto.

MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

One of Canada's best-performing hedge funds says stocks are still expensive after last week's correction and he sees little to get excited about.

"Right now we're still nowhere close to an equalization in interest rates with equity markets," said David McLean, managing director at Toronto-based McLean Asset Management Ltd. His $60-million ROMC Fund was a winner in the 2017 Canadian Hedge Fund Awards for best five-year return in the equity category with an annual gain of 18 percent. The fund also won in 2016.

His goal is to find stocks with double-digit earnings yields, which are the inverse of the more commonly used P/E ratio and measure the rate of return on an investment. The earnings yield on the S&P 500 Index today is 4.7 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

"2009 was exciting when earnings yields on the S&P 500 and pretty much every stock market everywhere were above 10 per cent," Mr. McLean said. "Today I don't see any area that's bombed out so no, I can't get excited."

He's seeing some opportunities in U.S. health care, transportation and advertising, and recently took a long position in Hong Kong-based cargo shipper Seaspan Corp., but isn't a "general buyer of any one asset class today."

Permanently Impaired

Mr. McLean is particularly unenthused about Canadian stocks, even though the benchmark S&P/TSX Composite Index generates a slightly higher earnings yield than the S&P 500 at 5.5 per cent.

"Canada is concentrated in areas that don't much interest us," he said, pointing to commodity stocks, which make up about 30 per cent of the benchmark. "We're looking for stable businesses that have the option to buy back stocks, issue handsome dividends or invest for growth."

That would typically describe the Canadian banks, which make up 35 per cent of the S&P/TSX, but he believes U.S. banks are more attractive because of their lower leverage.

Mr. McLean is also adamantly opposed to the complex volatility products that have been blamed for last week's market rout, which sent the S&P 500 into official correction territory. Some of these products bet on low volatility and plunged when the VIX spiked from 11 to the 30s in just over a week.

Story continues below advertisement

"You're packaging a product that's a derivative of a derivative of a derivative. Where does it end?" he said. "Unless the VIX comes back down to a level of around 10, these people are permanently impaired, their savings are permanently impaired."

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.