Skip to main content

U.S. banks are cheap and operate in a market that's largely recovered from its real estate bust.

David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Norman Rothery is the value investor for Globe Investor's Strategy Lab. Follow his contributions here and view his model portfolio here.

Two-for-one sales can inspire mixed feelings in the aisles of the grocery store. While I love big discounts, I have a hard time accommodating an extra bag of potato chips. But I never get my fill of bargain stocks and the market is now offering a rare three-for-one deal on U.S. bank stocks.

Heading south to buy banks doesn't come easily to many Canadians who love their hometown heroes and their many attractive qualities. The big Canadian banks are seen as safe bets and have a long history of paying generous tax-advantaged dividends. The industry also operates as a cozy oligopoly that has a great deal of pricing power, which has only gotten better due to the recent acquisitions of Ally and ING Direct.

Story continues below advertisement

However, the real estate collapse that pummelled the United States is long overdue to make an appearance north of the border. As it stands, housing remains unaffordable in many large Canadian cities and that prompts many new homeowners to take on debt that can only be repaid under optimistic scenarios. An unexpected breeze could knock real estate prices down and a collapse is possible – which wouldn't do our banks, or the economy, any good.

On the other hand, U.S. banks are much less than loved and operate in a more competitive environment. The real estate market stateside has already corrected and it's likely to improve over time, which should help to buoy U.S. banks.

Real estate aside, my main beef with Canadian bank stocks is simply their price. They trade at valuations that are far higher than their U.S. counterparts.

To get a sense of bank valuations I like to start with tangible book value which tallies up a firm's assets, excluding intangible items like goodwill, and subtracts liabilities. While it's not a perfect gauge, banks with modest price-to-tangible-book-value ratios (P/TB) are often bargains.

As a rough rule of thumb, bad times tend to push bank stocks to, or below, tangible book value, where they often represent good deals. On the other hand, banks may trade at two, three, or even more times tangible book value in happy times, when it might be better to sell them.

These days the big Canadian banks trade between about 1.8 and 3.1 times tangible book value, which is reasonably high, historically speaking. The cheapest of the bunch is the Bank of Montreal. As it often does, Royal Bank of Canada takes the crown at the high end.

On the other hand, it's easy to find large U.S. banks trading at, or below, tangible book value, which makes them much cheaper than Canadian banks.

Story continues below advertisement

The accompanying table shows a selection of large U.S. and Canadian banks and how they stack up based on their P/TB ratios. For instance, you could swap Royal Bank for Bank of America and buy 3.7 times as much tangible book value in the process. It's even better than a three-for-one sale.

Mind you, the difference in ratios was not always so wide. At one point U.S. banks were the darlings of the industry and traded at higher ratios than the Canadian banks, which were then viewed as being far too stodgy.

Back in 2006 both Bank of America and RBC traded at more than four times tangible book value.

Times have changed and the economic trajectory of the two countries has, to some extent, worn off on the stocks. But the valuation difference will likely narrow over time as it has many times before. As a result, you might want to pick up a few of those three-for-one bargains while the getting is good.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter