Skip to main content

In recent months, theme park stocks have been a hot ticket to profits.

Joey Ray/Six Flags Great Adventure

The companies that operate theme parks have been riding their own roller coasters.

After a steep drop during the financial crisis, their shares are once again climbing sharply.

Investors have been thrilled to discover businesses that can grow revenues in a lacklustre economy while throwing off gushers of cash – especially when that cash is promptly returned to shareholders in the form of dividends.

Story continues below advertisement

In recent months, theme park stocks have been a hot ticket to profits. Six Flags Entertainment Corp., owner of 18 parks including La Ronde in Montreal, and Cedar Fair LP, owner of 21 properties including Canada's Wonderland near Toronto, hit 52-week highs late last month. And SeaWorld Entertainment Inc. provided one of the spring's top IPOs, pricing at the top of its expected range, then climbing nearly 30 per cent on its trading debut.

The momentum suggests that the shares may have further to climb, especially if you believe the economy will avoid its own House of Horrors. Among other virtues, theme parks are a way to benefit from the recuperating bottom line of the U.S. consumer.

"The consumer environment has been just okay, and in that environment, you've seen these companies put up pretty good numbers," says analyst Ian Corydon of B. Riley & Co. LLC. "So in a better consumer environment, they might have even more pricing power."

"I think you'll continue to see growth, and it's a function of not just attendance, but raising ticket prices and getting people to spend more once they're in the park," he adds.

Six Flags, Cedar Fair and SeaWorld represent relatively pure ways to play the theme park idea. (While Walt Disney Co. and Comcast Corp. have theme park divisions, each contributes only about 20 per cent of their parents' profit.)

In many ways, these theme park operators are comeback stories. Six Flags went into bankruptcy in 2009, emerging in 2010; Cedar Fair nearly sold itself to a private-equity firm in the recession at around $10 (U.S.) per share; it stayed independent, and the shares are up around 300 per cent since.

What happened? The bottom for these companies came, unsurprisingly, when consumers cut out nearly all their discretionary spending in the 2009 crash. The over-leveraged companies couldn't handle the drop in attendance and profits.

Story continues below advertisement

As the consumer returned, however, interest rates have remained low. That means the theme park companies can use the debt markets to refinance their borrowings or make investments in their properties on favourable terms.

All have been finding ways to drive attendance and grow revenue. New rides are part of the recipe: The "Leviathan" roller coaster at Canada's Wonderland helped make it the top-attended park in North America last year, according to a company spokesperson.

Another attraction for customers is the ability to pay on easy terms. Cedar Fair, for instance, targets budget-conscious consumers by allowing them to pay the $84 (Canadian) price of a new Canada's Wonderland season pass in six parts.

"They're emphasizing season-pass sales and innovative ways to pay for them," says John Puchalla, who follows the debt of the theme-park companies for Moody's Investors Service.

At the same time, the company is giving consumers who are willing to pay more that opportunity: In a program starting last year, Canada's Wonderland attendees can pay an extra $35 to $55 for the right to get at the front of the line for rides.

While these may not sound like huge innovations, they can have a big impact on the bottom line.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Corydon notes most parks operate well below capacity, so aside from a trivial amount in added labour costs, any bump in revenue "nearly all falls to pretax profits."

The three theme park companies posted 2012 sales growth between 3.9 per cent (Cedar Fair) and 7 per cent (SeaWorld). Meanwhile, Six Flags and SeaWorld increased their EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, by roughly 10 per cent. (Cedar Fair boosted its about 3 per cent.)

Given those growth numbers, none of the stocks is particularly cheap: Cedar Fair trades at nearly 18 times forward earnings, and Six Flags changes hands at 24 times.

The analysts who plan to cover SeaWorld haven't yet released earnings estimates because of the quiet period after the company's IPO, but the company now trades for 36 times its trailing earnings.

In part, the generous valuations reflect these stocks' lush payouts to investors. Cedar Fair has a 6-per-cent dividend yield, while Six Flags has a dividend that pays 5 per cent. SeaWorld's intended dividend of 20 cents (U.S.) per quarter works out to about 2.4 per cent.

"Investors have caught on to the fact these companies produce tremendous amounts of free cash flow," Mr. Corydon says. "Six Flags and Cedar Fair have both raised their dividends pretty significantly over the last couple of years, and SeaWorld has come out with a fairly attractive dividend yield. In addition to the business being strong, you have that dynamic as well."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Corydon looks at SeaWorld's industry-leading valuations and believes Six Flags, which he says "has superior free cash flow characteristics," should trade similarly.

His "buy" rating and $100 (U.S.) target price (compared to current levels around $75) is based on the idea Six Flags' shares should rise so its dividend and free-cash-flow yields more closely resemble SeaWorld's.

Mr. Corydon does not formally cover Cedar Fair, but it produces nearly as much free cash flow (more than $3 per share) as Six Flags (more than $4).

Using the same principle, at recent prices around $42, Cedar Fair stock would need to at least double for its free-cash-flow yield to match SeaWorld's.

In all, this suggests the ascent can continue.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies