Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

AdChoices
In this Friday, Nov. 13, 2015, file photo, the American flag flies above the Wall Street entrance to the New York Stock Exchange. (Richard Drew/AP)
In this Friday, Nov. 13, 2015, file photo, the American flag flies above the Wall Street entrance to the New York Stock Exchange. (Richard Drew/AP)

FIXED INCOME

U.S. bond market rises to liquidity challenge during rout Add to ...

In some ways, the $40.7-trillion U.S. bond market just passed an important test: It demonstrated that it could account for rapidly shifting views without breaking down.

This is significant because the Federal Reserve, big banks and investors have spent hundreds of hours studying the health of markets that help determine borrowing costs for consumers, companies and governments. The big fear has been that the infrastructure underlying these debt transactions has been hobbled by new regulations and a lack of modernization, resulting in an inability for investors to act on quick changes in sentiment.

But traders seemed to do just fine this month despite a significant disruption in the status quo. After Donald Trump was elected as the next U.S. president on Nov. 8, traders ratcheted up their expectations of inflation and benchmark borrowing costs. Treasuries and government agency-backed bonds experienced their biggest monthly decline since 2004. Corporate bonds suffered their biggest losses since 2013. Investors suddenly priced in significantly higher inflation and interest rates.

The drop in prices didn’t result from thin, inconclusive activity. On the contrary, trading in Treasuries surged to the highest levels in more than five years.

Activity in investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds also swelled, making this month the most active November on record.

And volumes in debt exchange-traded funds rose to the highest levels of the year.

All this seems to suggest that these markets operated just fine and should be able to accommodate additional shocks going forward. But there are some small signs of caution.

First, trading was largely concentrated in the most-active bonds, leaving many others out in the cold.

Investors also turned to stocks and Treasuries rather than trying to significantly alter their less-traded holdings.

Second, the sell-off didn’t stem from forced fund liquidations or a huge unexpected default. It was fueled by expectations about Mr. Trump’s potential policies, not new facts that demanded immediate action. While many investors believe that this rout is the start of a more prolonged rise in benchmark borrowing costs, others disagree, leading to a healthy two-sided market.

Bond markets performed smoothly in November. It’s clear traders have come up with new ways to operate, whether it’s using more ETFs, holding more cash or keeping a stash of popular bonds on hand. Investors may have experienced some losses, but they were largely able to execute trades. This is how markets are supposed to work, and it helps allay some fears about antiquated bond-trading mechanics.

Lisa Abramowicz is a columnist with Bloomberg News.

Report Typo/Error

Next story

loading

Trending

loading

Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular