Skip to main content

Groupon Chief Executive Andrew Mason smiles outside the Nasdaq Market following his company's IPO in New York November 4, 2011.

BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS

In a letter to Groupon employees, ousted CEO Andrew Mason wrote, "After four and a half intense and wonderful years as CEO of Groupon, I've decided that I'd like to spend more time with my family. Just kidding – I was fired today. If you're wondering why ... you haven't been paying attention."

Or you didn't read our previous Trading Shots from November 2012, "Why Groupon Should Fire Its CEO."

As Mr. Mason himself said in yesterday's letter, "From controversial metrics in our S1 to our material weakness to two quarters of missing our own expectations and a stock price that's hovering around one quarter of our listing price, the events of the last year and a half speak for themselves. As CEO, I am accountable."

Story continues below advertisement

You can read the full letter here.

Mr. Mason should be given credit for honesty and self-awareness. The board should be given credit for making the change, albeit a bit late.

The question for investors now, however, is whether anyone can fix Groupon? The answer is probably no.

Groupon's plan involves creating a two-person office of the chief executive; one of the two new heads is executive chairman Eric Lefkofsky. Investors should read this 2011 article from Fortune on Mr. Lefkofsky's history titled "The checkered history of Groupon's chairman."

Checkered history or not, the problems lie in the business. Increasingly, Mr. Mason's brainstorm of daily Internet-based couponing is looking like a fad.

Its core Groupon voucher business, which the company calls "third party revenue," fell nearly 14 per cent in 2012's fourth quarter, compared to the prior-year period.

Its newer "Groupon Goods" business, with profit margins markedly smaller than the coupons, provided the company's revenue growth.

Story continues below advertisement

Wednesday's earnings release also noted that cash flow was falling sharply and the company expected revenue and profit figures for the first quarter that are well below analyst expectations.

The market sent Groupon shares down more than 25 per cent, and if any board members still had sympathies to retain Mr. Mason, they were likely extinguished.

Who could see all of this misery coming? Plenty of people, including me.

In March, 2011.

In Nov., 2011.

And again, as mentioned, last November.

Story continues below advertisement

The fact that the doomsayers got this right suggests the company was fundamentally flawed from the beginning, and remains irreparably flawed today. Mr. Mason had a wonderful idea, but he has now gone from rising star, to shooting star that flamed out. His company will also likely vaporize.

READERS: Is Groupon more or less likely to fail with Mr. Mason gone?

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter