Skip to main content
book excerpt

The following is an excerpt from the MoneySense Guide to Retiring Wealthy.

Feeling poorer these days? Join the club. Although the economy has improved markedly since the meltdown of 2008-09, unemployment in Canada was still around 8% in mid-2010, after hovering around 6% in the years leading up to the financial crisis. Even those of us who remain employed saw a huge chunk of our RRSPs vanish into the jaws of the bear market. Bankruptcies are soaring and debt levels remain at heights that would have seemed unthinkable only a generation ago.

No matter what the economic conditions, it's human nature to assume you're falling behind. Many of us lie awake at night worrying about our finances and feeling the stab of envy. Are our friends making more than we are? How did our neighbours with the new BMW manage to sidestep the falling stock market that hammered us-or did they?

If you've been torturing yourself with such questions, the All-Canadian Wealth Test can shed some welcome light on your personal finances.

MoneySense launched the Wealth Test in 2000, and this version is our most comprehensive yet. It lets you see how you stack up against other Canadians on all the key dimensions of household prosperity.

Our research will tell you if you're earning more or less than your peers, if you're wealthier or poorer than others, and if your track record in the stock market is better or worse than that of most investors.



It wasn't a lost decade

Let's start with the good news-and, yes, there is good news. The average household is better off today than it was when Canada was zooming along at the peak of the dot-com boom. We're not trying to brush off the recent downturn, which robbed the typical Canadian of about a tenth of his or her accumulated wealth. But the average household was still 7% richer in real terms in 2009 than it was in bubbly 2000. That's an amazing-and encouraging-fact. Despite the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, prosperity still appears to be inching ahead.

Problem is, our prosperity comes with warning stickers. One is that our increase in average wealth has been accompanied by an increase in inequality. While the rich are definitely growing richer, it's not clear that middle- or working-class Canadians are any wealthier than they were a decade ago.

Just as worrisome is how we're getting richer. Despite a roaring bull market from 2003 through 2006 and a buoyant 2009, Canadians experienced little joy from the stock market in the last decade. More and more, we have come to depend upon real estate to drive our wealth upward. Thanks to record-low interest rates and innovations such as 35-year mortgages, eager home buyers have propelled housing prices to double their levels of a decade ago. Real estate now makes up an unprecedented share of our personal balance sheets. If the housing market stays strong, we remain prosperous. If home prices crack, look out below.



Two types of wealth

Before we examine these issues in more detail, we should explain that there are at least two ways to measure how well you're doing, financially speaking. One is to look at how much you earn in any given year-your income. The other is to look at how much you would have left over if you sold all your assets and paid all your debts. This is your net worth, or wealth.

You should examine both income and net worth to get a full picture of your financial situation. A recently graduated 30-year-old surgeon may have a high income, but not much net worth-yet. On the other hand, a retired farmer may have only a modest pension income, but an enormous net worth, because of the millions of dollars that his acres of prime farmland would fetch if he chose to sell them to a property developer or the corporate farmer next door.



The paycheque pyramid

The easiest way to start assessing your financial situation is by looking at your income. To give you the most accurate notion of how your paycheque stacks up, we've divided Canadians into two groups-those who are single and those who are part of families of two or more people. You would expect families to have higher household incomes than single-person households, and they do. The average unattached person has an income of $37,800. The average family has a household income of $91,500, or 2.4 times more than the unattached individual.

How does your paycheque rank? on the facing page, lets you see where you fit on the income ladder. We've split individuals and families into five equal subgroups based upon their incomes. These subgroups are known as quintiles. Each quintile holds one fifth, or 20%, of the larger group. We placed the lowest earners into the first quintile, the next lowest earners into the second quintile, and so on. Think of these quintiles as five equally spaced steps up the income ladder.

Looking at the dollar value of each step gives you a sense of what typical paycheques look like at various levels of society. To squeeze into the middle quintile for unattached earners-in other words, to make it nearly halfway up the income ladder, ahead of 40% of your peers-a single person requires an annual income of at least $20,901. To achieve the same status for a family, a husband and wife need combined incomes of at least $59,901.

These relatively low numbers may surprise you, especially if you live in Toronto or Calgary, but they are reality for most of the country. While it's common to read about million-dollar executives or multimillion-dollar hockey players, the typical Canadian earns less than a postman. You don't have to be a CEO, a highly paid athlete, or even a doctor to break into the top tier of income earners. A single bookkeeper who makes $52,000 a year ranks among the top 20% of unattached earners. Two married school teachers who together earn $120,000 a year qualify as a top-quintile family.



Rich man, poor woman

If you're not used to thinking of bookkeepers and teachers as members of Canada's financial elite, it may be a matter of where you hail from. There are vast differences between provinces. We've outlined these differences in The singles scene and The household hierarchy on the next two pages. The tables show the average (not the minimum) earnings for each quintile of society. As you can see, Alberta and Ontario are the highest-earning provinces, while Newfoundland and P.E.I. are the lowest.

The average top-quintile family in Alberta earns a joint income of $233,800; the average top-quintile family in P.E.I. makes only $136,300.

Your earning power depends not just on your place of residence, but on your sex. Women make, on average, about two-thirds of what men do. While earnings vary widely by age, women as a group earn an average of $31,600 a year, while men earn an average of $47,200. The disparity begins before earners turn 20. It grows until pre-retirement and then narrows a bit after the age of 65. The narrower gap for younger women suggests that they may be placing a higher priority on their careers than did previous generations. But there is no sign that the disparities between sexes-or among regions-is going to end anytime soon.

If anything, Canada's income distribution is becoming even more skewed. The top 20% of all households collect nearly half of all the income generated in Canada. The poorest 20% of households get only 4%. Inequality between the rich and poor has been slowly growing for the past two decades and stands at record levels.

While the rich are gaining ground and the poor are losing ground, the middle is inching ahead slowly. The average Canadian family has seen its after-inflation earnings tick up a total of only 20% since 1990, or about a percentage point a year. If you're under 40, you know all about this slow growth. While folks who started working in the 1950s through 1970s saw their incomes rise rapidly, the generation that came of age since 1990 has had to settle for grudging gains.



Your bottom line

While incomes are far from equal, wealth is even more unbalanced. The richest 20% of Canadian households control about 69% of the wealth in Canada. The next quintile down possesses a further 20% of our national net worth.

Not much is left over for other people. The -bottom 60% of households control only 11% of Canada's wealth. In fact, the bottom fifth of the population possess no wealth and actually owes a few thousand dollars more than it owns.

In Are you rich yet? on page 126, we show you how your wealth compares to other Canadians. The net worth figures in the table include the current value of everything you own-your home, your car, your bank account, your RRSPs and other investments, your small business, and, yes, even your company pension. You should total up all these assets, then deduct your debts and other liabilities to arrive at your net worth.

It doesn't take a huge sum to be considered middle class. If you're an unattached individual, you're richer than 40% of your peers if you have $16,501 in net worth, or about the cost of a modest new car. A family qualifies for the middle quintile with $167,001 in net worth, which is about half the price of a typical Canadian house.

The average net worth of a Canadian household last year stood at $385,000, down almost 10% from the level we hit in the fall of 2007, when the average net worth of a Canadian household hit a peak of $428,000 (in today's dollars). As we mentioned earlier, we're still doing all right if you take a longer viewpoint. Back in 2000, the average Canadian household was worth only $360,000 (again, in -today's dollars). It is remarkable that even after two terrible bear markets our average net worth was still 7% higher than at the peak of the dot-com boom. (Of course, a pessimist might say that this is a very small advance over a decade!)

Up until now we've discussed wealth in terms of averages. In many ways, though, it's more

instructive to look at medians. What's the -difference between these two measures? The average net worth is the sum of all the personal wealth in the group, divided by the total number of households in the group. This figure can be distorted by a handful of extremely wealthy households. (If Bill Gates and you and I sit down for lunch, we're all billionaires on average-but chances are that neither you nor I have anything close to a billion dollars.) In contrast, the median net worth is the wealth of a household that sits right in the middle of the wealth spectrum, with half of all households having more wealth and half having less wealth. (If Bill Gates and you and I sit down for lunch, the median net worth is going to be either your net worth or mine-whichever one of us happens to fall in the middle.)

Average household net worth is pulled up by the 20% of households who control most of the household wealth in Canada. Median net worth is far less. In fact, in early 2009, the wealth of the median household was only $170,000 compared to the average of $385,000. The huge gap between median and average is a measure of how much the average figure is pulled up by a tiny number of very wealthy households.

A slow climb, to the right, lets you measure your own net worth by age, either in terms of averages or in terms of medians. As you can see, wealth tends to grow slowly over the course of our lifetimes.

You typically hit the peak level of your wealth when you are 55 to 64 years of age. By that point, the average household has accumulated a net worth of about $670,000. But don't forget that this figure is lifted upward by a small number of wealthy households. The median household of the same age is worth only about $420,000. In general, the median figure is the more representative of a typical household and we suggest you use medians for most comparisons.



Who gets wealthy?

If you're looking for a formula that will allow you to become wealthy, let us help. We've broken down the key factors for you.

First, it helps to be born male. Households in which a man is the primary earner have net worths that are $36,000 above the overall median for all types of households of $170,000.

Next, it's important to be patient. Wealth grows gradually over the course of your life. A household headed by someone under 35 typically has a net worth that is $145,000 below the median. A household headed by someone 55 to 64 usually has wealth that is $250,000 above the median.

Just like your mother told you, it pays to get an education. A household headed by someone with a university degree or certificate typically has a net worth that is $90,000 greater than the median. A hard-working spouse can be another huge advantage. Households with two or more earners have wealth that is $98,000 above the median.

To see where you should be in life (at least, according to the stats), use our All-Canadian Wealth Test to the right. It allows you to compare yourself to similar Canadians. You input your age, your marital status, your education level and other criteria. The test shows you the median net worth accumulated by other people with the same characteristics as yourself. If you're ahead of the median, you can pat yourself on the back. If you're behind, you may want to think about the reasons why.

No matter how you score on the Wealth Test, keep the results in perspective. Our calculations don't account for factors such as bad health or divorce that can devastate your net worth. Neither do they reflect location. If you're living in a small town, or in an area with lower incomes, your net worth is not going to be as high as someone who has benefitted from the higher salaries and more exuberant real estate markets of a big city.

Our test also ignores the question of how you got your money. Canada is still a land of opportunity, but in an age where middle-class incomes aren't budging by much, inherited wealth can play a big role in determining where you wind up.

According to Statistics Canada, 36% of families in the wealthiest quintile of the population have received an inheritance; the average amount of that inheritance was $136,000. In contrast, only 10% of families in the bottom quintile inherited money and the average amount of that inheritance was only $13,200. No matter how hard you work, it is also good to be born into, marry into, or know people with money.



Warning signs

Despite some tough times, most of us can take some satisfaction in how our net worth has grown over the past decade. But we should be aware of three warning signs that may indicate trouble ahead.

Warning Sign No. 1 is our addiction to debt. Back in 1990, the typical Canadian owed 91% of his or her disposable income. By 2000, our ratio of personal debt to disposable income had grown to 111%. In 2009 it soared past 142%. We appear to have compensated for our stagnant paycheques over the past couple of decades by borrowing to make up for the raises we missed.

High debt levels are an excellent predictor of bankruptcies, so the galloping increases in our personal debt make it likely that we will see more insolvency during the years ahead. Some indicators of financial stress are already flashing red. To take just one example, the rate of insolvency among Canadians 55 and older has shot up by more than 500% since 1990. Call this Warning Sign No. 2.

It is a striking and worrisome fact that more and more Canadians are reaching the end of their working lives encumbered by debt. It seems that as the boomer generation edges into their 60s, a significant number of people are finding themselves unprepared for retirement.

This brings us to Warning Sign No. 3: our fascination with real estate. One reason that so many Canadians-even older Canadians-have large amounts of debt is because of our growing reliance on real estate-and hence mortgages and lines of credit backed by real estate. Back in the mid-1990s, real estate constituted about a third of a typical household's assets. It now accounts for 40%. If real estate prices remain strong, our willingness to go into debt to buy homes will be justified. But our wealth will take a painful hit if home prices dip.



Looking ahead

We can all take some comfort in the resilience of our economy. Sure, you've probably lost money, as have most of us. But despite the volatile stock market and challenging economy, we are still a bit richer than we were back in 2000.

That said, we should be conscious of the risks around us. Inequality is a pressing issue and could become even more so if the current trends continue. Meanwhile, unprecedented levels of personal debt and a frothy home market add up to a dangerous combination. If you don't think that a U.S.-style housing crash could happen here, think again. Canadians are now carrying debt loads very similar to the ones in the U.S. before its economy began to implode in 2006.

If one theme deserves to dominate the next few years, it's the rebuilding of personal balance sheets. Given our high amounts of debt and heavy reliance upon real estate, it would make sense for most of us to pay down our loans and diversify our -assets.

Every situation is different, of course. But we hope that we've given you the tools to see how your finances compare to other Canadians and help you make the right decision for you.



Roger Sauvé is the president of People Patterns Consulting ( www.peoplepatternsconsulting.com) and the author of The Current State of Canadian Family Finances, published each year by the Vanier Institute of the Family.



Excerpted from MoneySense Guide to Retiring Wealthy Copyright © 2010 by Rogers Publishing Limited. Reproduced with permission from the publisher. All rights reserved.



The MoneySense Guide to Retiring Wealthy is available now at Chapters, Indigo, Shopper's Drug Mart, Walmart and Loblaws or order a copy of the book online here: moneysense.ca/nestegg

Interact with The Globe