Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain expansion snags oil customers

A Kinder Morgan crew installs pipe in 2007 near Windy Point, Alta., on the Trans Mountain Pipeline

Kinder Morgan Canada

Nine major players in Canada's oil patch have signed on to ship crude on Kinder Morgan Inc.'s proposed expanded pipeline to a port near Vancouver.

Most of the pipeline's customers, who signed 20-year agreements, are energy companies with major expansion projects under way in the oil sands. Kinder Morgan already moves oil to the west coast on its Trans Mountain network, and has proposed a $4.1-billion expansion.

The energy industry is lobbying hard for pipelines to Canada's west coast, which would give producers access to Asian customers. This would push up profits because it would create a second market for Canadian crude, rather than relying solely on the United States.

Story continues below advertisement

However, while proponents argue the economic angle means access to the west coast should be an urgent priority in Canada, detractors stress this is outweighed by the environmental consequences of potential leaks along the route or a tanker spill in the ocean.

Kinder Morgan, in filing to the National Energy Board related to tolls Friday, said BP PLC, Canadian Oil Sands Ltd., Cenovus Energy Inc., Devon Energy Corp., Husky Energy Inc., Imperial Oil Ltd., Nexen Inc., Statoil ASA, and Tesoro Corp. have backed the pipeline.

Kinder Morgan said it has contracts in place to ship 508,000 barrels of oil per day on the network. After the expansion, Trans Mountain will be able to move 750,000 barrels of oil per day. It wants to leave about 20 per cent of the pipeline available for spot shippers. Trans Mountain's current capacity is 300,000 barrels of oil per day.

The company asked the NEB to approve the firm shipping agreements it struck with the nine oil companies. Kinder Morgan plans to apply in 2013 for regulatory approval to build the expansion. Trans Mountain spans 1,150 kilometres.

"What this filing today is, is our request [to] the...National Energy Board for approval...of economic and commercial terms that underpin the economic viability of the project," Ian Anderson, president of Kinder Morgan's Canadian division, said in a conference call with reporters.

Enbridge Inc. is in the midst of regulatory hearings tied to its proposed Northern Gateway project. The route snakes from Alberta to Kitimat, B.C., and has sparked a fierce environmental backlash. While there is already an existing Trans Mountain line, its opponents argue increased tanker traffic near Vancouver is unwelcome. Both companies argue pipelines are the safest way to transport oil, and tankers are also safe.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

Carrie Tait joined the Globe in January, 2011, mainly reporting on energy from the Calgary bureau. Previously, she spent six years working for the National Post in both Calgary and Toronto. She has a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Western Ontario and a bachelor’s degree in political studies from the University of Saskatchewan. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨