Skip to main content

Today's media are full of advice for the retail investor. At least 99 per cent of that advice relates to before-tax investment returns. It ignores the fact that people live in an after-tax world.

In part, this happens because people find thinking about investing and tax planning at the same time to be much like patting their head and rubbing their stomach – surprisingly difficult.

When a tax issue is raised with an investment adviser, the ill-considered response is often, "Don't let the tax tail wag the investment dog." In fact, maximizing investment returns and minimizing taxes are, more often than not, entirely compatible goals.

Story continues below advertisement

Consider some simple examples. Over time, stocks are likely to produce a higher before-tax investment return than bonds, and the return from stocks (dividends and capital gains) is taxed at a lower rate than interest from bonds.

Also, low-fee index funds or ETFs beat 80 per cent of actively managed retail mutual funds over time. Because the lower turnover within the index products defers the payment of capital gains tax, these low-fee products are also more tax efficient.

But let's assume that you, like most people, have elected to use an active investment manager, a financial planner or a traditional stock broker as your financial adviser. Your instructions are that the selection of securities is to be made with a view to maximizing your before-tax investment return. Should you also expect your adviser to minimize the tax that you pay on your investments? Absolutely you should.

A knowledgeable adviser who puts your interest first will take the time to allocate your securities among your accounts in the most tax-efficient fashion. This will have a material effect on the amount of capital you are able to live on in your retirement.

Imagine you have a total portfolio of $1-million, of which $490,000 is in an RRSP account, $490,000 is in a non-registered (i.e. taxable) account and $20,000 is in a Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA). Your portfolio consists of Canadian and U.S stocks, most of which pay a dividend.

Your U.S. stocks are paying you dividends that, if held in a taxable account, would be taxed at your highest marginal tax rate. To the extent possible, these stocks should be held in your RRSP. If you do this, not only are the U.S. dividends not currently taxable, but under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty there is no withholding tax levied by the U.S. government on the dividends.

Most of your Canadian stocks pay a dividend. On these Canadian dividends you get a dividend tax credit, which, if held in a taxable account, can result in anything from no tax to a tax rate well below your top marginal rate. So, to the extent possible, these stocks can be held in your non-registered account.

Story continues below advertisement

Your TFSA shelters from tax the income and capital gains relating to securities held in the TFSA. However, dividend-paying U.S. stocks should not be held in a TFSA account as one can never recapture in a TFSA the otherwise refundable withholding tax paid on U.S. dividends. High-dividend-paying Canadian stocks are a better choice.

And what about those shares of Berkshire Hathaway that you bought 10 years ago and expect to hold for the long run? Because Berkshire does not pay a dividend, and this will likely be a long-term hold, you can achieve a major tax deferral simply by holding your Berkshire shares in your taxable account. They should not be held in your RRSP account because that would have the effect, when you cash in your RRSP, of converting the low tax rate on the realization of a capital gain to your then top marginal tax rate.

Because you live in an after-tax world, your objective should be a high after-tax investment return. Accomplishing this objective involves both maximizing your before-tax return and minimizing the tax you pay on that return.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter