Skip to main content

fazon1/Getty Images/iStockphoto

The debate over whether we have a healthy housing market has lately begun to look beyond the question of whether a correction is coming. There's a new emphasis now on the implications of continued rising prices, particularly on first-time buyers.

Vice Canada recently posed the question of what would happen if young people stopped buying homes to two experts: Paul Kershaw, a policy professor at the UBC School of Population and Moshe Milevsky, a professor of finance at the Schulich School of Business at York University. Prof. Kershaw says fewer purchases by young buyers could have a negative effect on home prices in general.

I argued in a recent column that declining housing affordability means we're going to get over our prejudice against renting. Housing economist Paul Smetanin nicely makes the case for renting in saying: "You don't have to own your own home in order to have a great home."

Story continues below advertisement

Subscribe to Carrick on Money
Click here to have my newsletter e-mailed to you twice weekly.

This is what scares baby boomers most
Investment advisers say the top concern of their baby boomer clients is not running out of money; it's developing dementia and becoming a burden on their families. Tips for lowering the risk of Alzheimers are included here.

These cars are good to buy used
It's because they depreciate quickly in price. The original buyer's loss is your gain.

10 myths about finding cheap travel
A merciless look at all the wrong ideas people have for finding travel bargains. Bereavement fares for a flight? Forget about it.

There's no such thing as good debt
A useful deconstruction of the widely held view that it's sometimes smart to borrow. I prefer to call debt a necessary evil when used to buy a home or get a post-secondary education.

Are you wasting time to save money?
A reminder to start valuing your time as well as your money when looking for the best deals on everything from groceries and gas to vacations and even houses.

Beware the personal finance echo chamber
A blogger observes that people in the online world of personal finance say a lot of the same things – debt is bad, saving is good and so forth. It's a great point to raise because it's debatable how effective it is to keep offering these messages in the same old way.

Story continues below advertisement

Today's featured financial tool
Here's a tool I use all the time – the Bank of Canada's inflation calculator. Handy for figuring out how much your earnings and expenses years ago would be worth today.

Ask Rob
The question:
"The social contract is broken for millennials - student debt, followed by precarious work with few health benefits, and no pension. Retirement for my husband and me is secure. Would two times $80,000, invested now and left for 20 years, provide enough of a safety net for each of our two kids so that they can withstand these shocks in their thirties/forties? Are other parents looking at doing this?"

My reply: Not that I've heard. Parents helping their adult kids today seem obsessed about getting them into the housing market, not providing a financial cushion that can be used in a variety of ways. I really like this idea. Oh - $80,000 invested for 20 years with an average annual return of 5 per cent after fees would produce $212,264 before taxes. Most generous.

Do you have a question for me? Send it my way. Sorry I can't answer every one personally. Questions and answers are edited for length.

Featured Video
Some smart thinking in this video about how to get millennials interested in saving for retirement. Make the conversation more about buying financial freedom that about saving for the distant future.

More Carrick and money coverage
For more money stories, follow me on Twitter and join the discussion on my Facebook page. Millennial readers, join our Gen Y Money Facebook group.

Story continues below advertisement

Send us an e-mail to let us know what you think of my newsletter.

Want to subscribe? Click here to sign up.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter