Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

While fewer Canadians surveyed say they are living paycheque to paycheque, the Canadian Payroll Association says the long-term financial outlook for many Canadians remains ‘troubling.’

Getty Images/iStockphoto

A new study by the Canadian Payroll Association suggests fewer Canadians are living paycheque to paycheque compared with last year.

Of those polled, 42 per cent said they would be in financial trouble if their pay was delayed by even one week, down from 47 per cent last year.

However, the Canadian Payroll Association says the long-term financial outlook for many Canadians remains "troubling."

Story continues below advertisement

The survey, released Wednesday, says 40 per cent of employed Canadians are spending all of – or more than – their net pay.

And almost half – 45 per cent – of those polled are putting only five per cent or less of their pay into savings.

The online poll surveyed 2,863 employees between July 26 and August 16. The polling industry's professional body, the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population like traditional telephone polls.

Meanwhile, the survey also noted that a "disturbing" 47 per cent of respondents age 50 or older are still less than a quarter of the way to their retirement savings goals.

"There is a huge gap between how much money people say they will need to retire and how much they are actually saving for retirement," the survey said.

The Canadian Payroll Association represents payroll professionals, who are responsible for ensuring the timely payment of wages and benefits.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies