Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Canadians still turning to credit and going into debt to finance their lifestyles.

Editor's note: This article first ran in September of 2013.

According to David Graeber, author of the book Debt: The First 5000 Years, the term 'freedom' was originally associated with freedom from debt. It translated into "return to mother" because when debtors fell into arrears badly enough, their children were taken away from them.

Today, we are overly comfortable with debt. In this TEDx talk, I contend that we need to start hating it again. While it plays an important function in our economy when used responsibly, too many people use it irresponsibly.

Story continues below advertisement

The often quoted household debt-to-income ratio, which recently hit an all-time high of 163.4 per cent, doesn't tell the whole story. It doesn't factor in the effect of lower interest rates. That makes a difference because $100 per month supports a lot more borrowing in a low rate environment than a high one, with no additional strain on cash flow.

Younger Canadians should expect a ratio north of 200 per cent to be quite normal as their incomes are low and they are entering a period of their life traditionally associated with many big expenses: weddings, houses, children, first reliable cars, etc. Older Canadians should have ratios of 0 per cent. It also doesn't speak to the other side of the balance sheet: assets. Household net worth has been increasing.

But are these changes good news or bad news? When I talk to everyday people, they seem to be struggling more and more. Income inequality could explain the reconciliation of data. The rich could be getting richer, and the poor could be getting poorer.

When I was a financial adviser, there were two traits that separated those who seemed to be naturally good with money from those who weren't, irrespective of their grasp on investing and financial planning . They ran a surplus, and they knew that you earn interest, you don't pay it.

That's it.

In the talk, I give the example of the cost of a $35,000 car varying from $34,000 to $43,000. Using a high-interest savings account, you could save just a bit less than the total price with the difference being made up by earned interest. Financing via a seven-year loan could incur $8,000 in interest charges. Given that the average person will own nine cars in their lifetime, a household requiring two cars could spend the equivalent of 4.6 cars in interest expenses. But what tends to happen for those who save up in advance is that they spend less and buy less often. Parting with cash from your bank account is often harder than arranging financing for the same amount.

In this simple example, the choice to save up for a depreciating asset versus financing amounts to $162,000 (18 cars x $9,000 savings). If you additionally earned interest on the savings, that figure grows significantly. Forget "return to mother," come to daddy.

Story continues below advertisement

Preet Banerjee, a personal finance expert, is the host of Million Dollar Neighbourhood on The Oprah Winfrey Network. You can read his blog at WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com and follow him on Twitter at @preetbanerjee.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies