Skip to main content

File photo of a Tembec lumber yard in Quebec.

Jacques Boissinot/The Canadian Press

Two forestry companies have reached agreement with environment groups, northern towns and a first nations community on a plan to protect a critical caribou habitat in northeastern Ontario, in the first of what the industry pledges will be a series of such deals across the country.

Executives from Tembec Inc. and Resolute Forest Products were among the partners who unveiled the agreement covering some three million hectares at a news conference at the provincial legislature on Thursday. The province must approve the plan, and Natural Resources Minister Michael Gravelle – who praised the effort – pledged speedy review.

Under the deal, some 835,000 hectares in the Abitibi River forest – an area roughly the size of Yellowstone Park in the U.S. – will be excluded from timber harvesting in order to protect the threatened woodland caribou, considered a bellwether species whose fate reflects the health of the ecosystem.

Story continues below advertisement

Tembec president Jim Lopez said the deal not only represents good environmental policy, but will ensure the company's sawmills have access to wood supply that will sustain operations for the foreseeable future.

"The best plan for the environment is the best economic plan as well," he said.

He said Tembec will now work at implementing similar deals across its operations in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia under a two-year-old Boreal Forest Agreement that includes 19 companies and nine environmental groups.

The industry – and the northern towns that rely on it – have faced uncertainty after the provincial government decreed that land must be set aside to protect the caribou. For the Abitibi region, the provincial Department of Natural Resources released a draft plan that Mr. Lopez said would deal a severe blow to a Tembec sawmill.

Instead, the companies and environmental organizations crafted a plan that would protect jobs as well as key habitat areas, and then won approval from local municipalities and first nations.

Compared to the provincial proposal, the new plan shifted the protected areas northward, into a region where the trees were less valuable and the habitat remains undisturbed. In return, the firms got more access to timber closer to their mills.

Janet Sumner, executive director of the CPAWS-Wildlands League, worked on the Abitibi Forest deal and said it represents a major step forward in the national effort to protect the boreal forest. Ms. Sumner's group is one of nine environmental organizations that reached the boreal forestry agreement with 22 companies and the Forest Products Association of Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

She acknowledged that signatories had hoped to maker faster progress reaching individual agreements covering specific forest ranges.

"Everybody in the agreement is feeling the stress of not getting things done as quickly as we wanted to," she said. Mr. Lopez agreed the pace has been slow, but said the agreements are incredibly complex because they require agreement not only from companies and environmental organizations, but local mayors and native communities as well.

Last month, three environmental groups, Greenpeace, ForestEthics and Canopy, released a report that complained about the lack of progress under the national boreal forest agreement. Greenpeace's Stephanie Goodwin said Thursday's announcement was a "first step in securing certainty for this small portion of the boreal."

A customers group – which includes companies like The Globe and Mail and Kimberly-Clark – released a letter supporting the Abitibi Forest plan, but urged the participants in the boreal forest plan to work more quickly to reach similar deals across the country.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter