Skip to main content

Eastern and western attitudes differ when it comes to pipelines in Canada, a TransCanada executive said.

Eric Hylden/The Associated Press

TransCanada Corp. does not expect to see a big environmental push-back to its plan to ship western oil eastward, which could come to fruition around 2017, a company executive said Wednesday.

Alex Pourbaix, who is in charge of energy and oil pipelines at TransCanada, said 80 per cent of the pipe required is already in the ground.

"Even where we don't have pipeline in the ground, we already have right of way and have relationships with landowners in that part of the world. So I think that's very significant," he told an investor conference.

Story continues below advertisement

Eastern Canadians are also keenly aware of how such a plan would affect fuel prices where they live, he added.

"Right now Eastern Canada has the highest refined products prices on the continent," he said.

He added, "it doesn't take a great leap of logic" to conclude that filling eastern refineries with domestic crude is better than importing pricier oil from overseas.

Pipeline proposals to the other side of the country, on the other hand, have been met with fierce resistance, particularly within B.C. where there are concerns that a spill from a pipeline itself, or from supertankers moving through coastal waters could cause dire environmental harm.

Eastern and western attitudes differ when it comes to pipelines, Mr. Pourbaix said.

"Unlike B.C., there is a pretty significant long-term tradition of moving oil in that part of the world," he said.

For instance, tankers have moved to and from the Irving Oil refinery in St. John for 50 years.

Story continues below advertisement

"Every day, tankers transit up and down the St. Lawrence Seaway and I think everybody also gets the concept that, to the extent we are able to extend a pipeline towards the East Coast, that would have the impact of actually reducing tanker transits, which I think everybody sees as more risky than pipelines."

TransCanada's proposal would involve converting a portion of its part-empty natural gas mainline to gas service with the help of extra pump stations and other tweaks.

The company has deemed the proposal to be economically and technically feasible and has said its customers would be keen to see it built. It intends to more formally gauge just how much support the project has in the coming months.

Taking into account a few years of regulatory review and a few years of construction, Mr. Pourbaix said he sees it starting up around 2017.

Enbridge Inc. is also looking at shipping western crude east by expanding some of its pipes in the Great Lakes region and reversing the flow of a pipeline that currently runs from Montreal to Southern Ontario.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair said in an interview Tuesday that he supports the eastern pipeline proposals, provided they undergo a thorough environmental review.

Story continues below advertisement

In contrast, he dismissed Enbridge's $6-billion Northern Gateway pipeline between Alberta and the West Coast as a "non-starter" on environmental grounds and that approving it would be a "historical mistake."

He's also opposed to shipping more raw bitumen south of the border through TransCanada's Keystone XL project because it would mean the loss of Canadian oil processing jobs.

"We think rather than going that way, more to the States, we should take care of our own energy security first," Mr. Mulcair said.

"That would be a win-win-win situation – a win for the producing provinces, a win for the companies that have their own ownership of what they've bought or leased and a win for the country because we'd be providing greater energy security for the future."

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter