Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Just how toxic is the data-privacy scandal for Facebook?

So toxic that some investment funds now are lumping in the social network with big polluters and other corporations they consider ethically challenged.

As Facebook has struggled to contain the damage from Cambridge Analytica’s use of personal data from 50 million users, some environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds have started to rethink their interest in the company. In a nutshell, they’re viewing the breach as the digital equivalent of a toxic waste spill -- one that has prompted calls for greater government oversight of social-media companies.

Story continues below advertisement

The BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF removed Facebook from its fund last week, citing a reassessment after the Cambridge Analytica data breach and other controversies. Facebook accounts for about 3.9 per cent of the fund, the largest ethical ETF traded in Australia. Nordea Bank also blacklisted the stock last week, saying it won’t let its sustainable-investment unit buy more amid concerns about “systemic issues.” Other Nordic investors focused on ESG issues also are reviewing their holdings.

“Data security and privacy are significant ESG risks,” Janicke Scheele, head of responsible investments at DNB Asset Management AS, said in an e-mail, adding that she’s following the situation closely.

The turmoil has blown about $90 billion of market value out of Facebook stock in the past 10 days, after reports that Cambridge Analytica, the data-analysis company that helped with President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, kept data from 50 million users even after telling Facebook it had destroyed the information. The shares dropped 2.4 per cent to $155.55 at 12:49 p.m. in New York, extending this year’s decline to 12 per cent, the fifth-worst performance among 70 companies in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.

Social-impact concerns

Ethical funds often make heavy bets on technology companies, which typically have a low carbon footprint and better-than-average transparency on environmental issues. The funds sometimes let this outweigh concerns about social impact or governance skewed toward founders.

Facebook has wooed do-good investors with pledges to aggressively reduce carbon emissions with renewable-energy investments. About 11 per cent of funds that specifically focus on environmentally or socially responsible investing hold about 6.3 million Facebook shares, according to data for almost 1,200 funds compiled by Bloomberg. Eighty ESG funds count Facebook as a top-10 holding, which helped drive their performance last year as the tech company’s stock rose.

MSCI Inc. and Robecosam AG, which issue sustainability ratings, are considering downgrading Facebook, spokesmen said. The company was never included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes, which Robecosam oversees, or the MSCI ESG Leaders indexes amid the concerns about regulatory risks from privacy and data security, and a lack of checks and balances in Facebook’s corporate governance, which leaves control with founder Mark Zuckerberg, they said.

Story continues below advertisement

Facebook spokeswoman Nora Chan said the company had no comment.

Sin stocks

Some socially responsible investors have begun lumping Facebook in with so-called sin stocks, such as tobacco or weapons shares, they routinely filter out of their portfolios.

“We’ve had a few requests around screening out Facebook in the past few days,” said Jennifer Sireklove, director of responsible investing at Eaton Vance Corp.’s Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, which works with foundations and endowments. But she’s telling investors “if your intent is to get the company to improve, you actually need to own the company and have a plan for engagement,” she said.

A shareholder proposal about Facebook’s content policies could become a flash point for concerned investors at this year’s annual meeting. The company’s board opposed the proposal, led by shareholders Arjuna Capital and the New York State Common Retirement Fund, but the investors behind it now anticipate increased support, according to Arjuna.

“At the end of the day, we want Facebook to step up their transparency and governance surrounding not only user privacy, but illegal and hateful content propagated over their platform,” said Natasha Lamb, managing partner at Arjuna. “We just requested a renewed dialogue with the company this week.”

Story continues below advertisement

Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for mistakes his company made in how it handled data belonging to 50 million of its users and promised tougher steps to restrict developers' access to such information. Reuters

– With assistance from Sarah Frier Chaz Weiner and Jonas Cho Walsgard

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies