Skip to main content

In the U.S., ETF assets under management jumped 185 per cent to US$7.2-trillion in the five years to 2021, according to the Investment Company Institute, while those of mutual funds rose 65 per cent to US$27-trillion over the same period.ANDREW KELLY/Reuters

Sign up for the new Globe Advisor weekly newsletter for professional financial advisors on our newsletter sign-up page. Get exclusive investment industry news and insights, the week’s top headlines, and what you and your clients need to know.

Neuberger Berman Group LLC and a clutch of some of the world’s biggest investors are joining the exchange-traded fund (ETF) industry for the first time as they seek a foothold in a fast-growing sector that has piled pressure on active managers to justify their fees.

The New York-based investment house is one of a group including Morgan Stanley, SEI Investments Co. and Matthews Asia Funds – together managing US$3-trillion – that have recently launched or signalled their intention to unveil their debut ETFs.

Those companies follow other recent heavyweight converts, such as T Rowe Price Group Inc., Dimensional Fund Advisors LP and Federated Hermes, in rushing to roll out ETFs as the products rapidly gain market share at the expense of traditional mutual funds.

The rollout of such ETFs comes against a backdrop of falling fund fees, in a further sign of the heat active managers face as investors capitalize on the proliferation of cheaper, passive products.

As a collection of securities tracking an index, an ETF is cheaper for a manager to run than an old-school, hands-on vehicle. Such savings are usually passed on to the end investor, along with superior tax efficiency – in the U.S. at least – boosting the appeal of the funds.

In the U.S., ETF assets under management (AUM) jumped 185 per cent to US$7.2-trillion in the five years to 2021, according to the Investment Company Institute, while those of mutual funds rose 65 per cent to US$27-trillion over the same period. Globally, ETF AUM have more than tripled to US$10.1-trillion since 2015, according to consultancy ETFGI LLP.

“If you talk about meeting clients where they are, the ETF tool is one that we want to offer alongside our other offerings,” says Noel Archard, global head of ETF and portfolio solutions at AllianceBernstein Holding LP (AB).

Morgan Stanley, which has US$1.4-trillion in AUM and was ranked 15th-largest by Willis Towers Watson Public Ltd. Co. in its latest report, is the largest fund provider not to offer ETFs.

However, an internal memo written by Dan Simkowitz, head of investment management at the bank, said it had made a “strategic decision” to launch a multi-asset ETF platform offering active and systematic strategies this year.

Morgan Stanley shared the memo, which was circulated in March, but declined to comment for this story.

For AB, the imminent arrival of its first U.S. ETFs will be the culmination of a 12-year journey.

It filed to launch equity ETFs in 2010 and was later granted approval by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, but the funds never saw the light of day. While AB was prevaricating, Cathie Wood took the decision to leave in 2014 and set up Ark Investment Management LLC, which has since launched a suite of ETFs.

AB appears to have rekindled its earlier enthusiasm for the idea of launching ETFs and filed earlier this month to roll out actively managed AB Ultra Short Income ETF and AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF.

Mr. Archard, who was recruited from State Street Global Advisors in February to head the push, says a “significant event” in AB’s ultimate conversion to ETFs was a SEC ruling in 2019 that simplified and accelerated the approval process for ETFs, including actively managed ones.

“It lowered one of the barriers to entry for many firms that had been thinking about getting into ETFs,” he says. “We have a predominantly active footprint. That change in rule prompted another look into whether we should we introduce [active ETFs].”

Mr. Archard says AB’s two initial fixed-income ETFs should list in “late Q3 or early Q4″ and it was planning “several equity products.”

While the rollout is starting in the U.S., Mr. Archard says AB was “not constraining” itself to any region. Its initial ETFs will have a fully transparent structure, which is essential in markets such as Europe where the portfolio-shielding, semi and non-transparent structures commonplace in the U.S. have yet to be approved.

Kevin Barr, head of the investment management unit at SEI, says the company was “looking for something that is differentiated. There really is not much need for more passive ETFs,” he adds.

The first fruits of these endeavours are four actively managed factor-based large-cap U.S. equity funds that launched on May 18. SEI has been running these strategies since 2013 in separately managed accounts, which are only available to institutions and wealthy individuals. Pricing is comparable at 15 basis points.

Although SEI is focusing initially on the U.S. market, Mr. Barr says it was “looking actively” at the possibility of launching active ETFs in Europe, with the need for full transparency again not a barrier.

“We’re comfortable with transparency. It’s not a passive approach where someone is going to be able to arbitrage it away,” he adds.

Neuberger Berman debuted its first three ETFs in April. The actively managed thematic equity strategies cover Next Generation Connected Consumer ETF, Carbon Transition and Infrastructure ETF, and Disrupters ETF, each at 55bps.

The firm already manages US$18-billion – out of US$460-billion in total – in thematic funds and Hari Ramanan, its chief investment officer of global research strategies, cites the “potential for tax efficiency” in expanding this range into ETFs.

Matthews Asia is also going down the transparent active equity route, filing in April for three ETFs focused on emerging markets, Matthews Asia Innovators Fund and Matthews China Fund, which build on its existing mutual funds in these areas.

“While we believe mutual funds will continue to provide benefits to many investors, we have seen a growing interest from financial intermediaries and end-investors who want to take advantage of the benefits active ETFs offer,” says Jonathan Schuman, Matthews Asia’s global head of distribution.

Matthews Asia may have spotted a potential gap in the market, given the relative lack of actively managed Asia or China-focused ETFs at present.

But all the ETF latecomers may have to find their own niches to gain a toehold in an industry dominated by BlackRock Inc., Vanguard Group Inc. and State Street, which together still account for over three-quarters of the U.S. market.

When asked how SEI’s offerings could challenge the three market leaders, Mr. Barr replies: “[We] don’t see people offering these products. These are differentiated products. This is not a ‘me too’ strategy.”

© The Financial Times Limited 2022. All Rights Reserved. FT and Financial Times are trademarks of the Financial Times Ltd. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.

For more from Globe Advisor, visit our homepage.