Skip to main content

There are an alarming number of similarities – aging demographics, high debt levels and projections of economic secular stagnation central among them – between developed markets now and Japan in the 1980s.

With this in mind, physician and financial author John Lim’s column Crash Course, outlining the central lessons of Japan’s boom and bust, is valuable reading for any investors with a medium to long term focus.

Dr. Lim sees five important takeaways from Japan’s experience: the importance of geographical diversification (for Americans primarily), holding bonds is key no matter how the equity market’s doing, not allowing market returns to change our risk tolerances, not completely trusting previous performance patterns, and the importance of mean reversion.

Story continues below advertisement

The third point about risk tolerances is the most relevant to current investors. In his description, Dr. Lim writes, “If we want to be successful investors, we must guard against risk tolerance “drift.” In a protracted bull market, we need to be careful not to allow our risk tolerance to creep higher - and we might even want to ratchet it down a notch.”

There are two areas where risk tolerance drift is apparent. In equity markets, the ‘buy the dip’ mentality that sees investors blindly buying equities every time they’re down, without respect for valuations, implies an unjustified degree of confidence and optimism.

The domestic real estate market is the other example. Strong housing price appreciation in major centers has created a widespread belief that real estate markets will climb higher every year, forever, and no amount of mortgage debt is too much.

As the author implies, risk tolerances should gradually decline as market rallies continue but the human mind works in the opposite direction, creating more and more confidence as risk rises.

-- Scott Barlow, Globe and Mail market strategist

This is the Globe Investor newsletter, published three times each week. If someone has forwarded this e-mail newsletter to you or you’re reading this on the web, you can sign up for the newsletter and others on our newsletter signup page.

Stocks to ponder

Story continues below advertisement

Andlauer Healthcare Group Inc. This small-cap company’s share price has rallied over 50 per cent above its initial public offering price (IPO) that was set just two months ago. With its seasoned management team, the company has delivered consistent revenue growth and has a steady EBITDA margin. Jennifer Dowty has this stock profile.

The Rundown

Investors shouldn’t fear another dot-com market crash

After years of big stock market gains, especially by giant tech companies, it’s no wonder many investors fear a replay of the tech-induced market crash of 2000. Maybe, though, we’re fretting over nothing. Despite isolated cases of irrational exuberance – yes, that’s you we’re talking about, Tesla Inc. – share prices, even in the tech sector, are still largely in touch with reality, according to a pair of reports last week. Ian McGugan reports

Why Wealthsimple and robo-advisers aren’t scaring Bay Street anymore

When Wealthsimple and rivals Nest Wealth and WealthBar launched in 2014, their allure was potent. Click on an app, answer a few questions about your finances, and an algorithm would assemble and manage a portfolio of low-cost exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for you for a fee around 0.5 per cent a year – one quarter the cost of many mutual funds. The hope was that these platforms would be revolutionary for millennial investors who did not want to deal with bank branch staff or high-cost full service investment advisers. And when the fee savings were compounded over decades, those young investors might earn hundreds of thousands of dollars more for retirement – maybe even millions. The reality: No robo has been able to get any real traction. Tim Kiladze and Clare O’Hara go indepth to find out why.

Story continues below advertisement

Others (for subscribers)

Rob Carrick’s 2020 ETF Buyer’s Guide: Best Canadian bond funds

Monday’s Insider Report: CEO of this large-cap financial stock gets a $1-million payday

Monday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades

U.S. consumer discretionary names could see bumpy ride

Ask Globe Investor

Story continues below advertisement

Question: My wife and I have a joint, non-registered portfolio (with right of survivorship) that is worth approximately $200,000 and is invested entirely in 15 mostly Canadian stocks. Unfortunately, I have been diagnosed with a terminal illness and expect to live another six months. My wife does not feel comfortable managing a portfolio of stocks, so we are looking to transfer some of the assets to more secure, lower-risk investments. What do you recommend? And what are the tax implications if we sell the stocks? I am 70 and my wife is 60, and the portfolio has a net unrealized capital gain (capital gains minus capital losses) of about $53,000.

Answer: I asked Jamie Golombek, managing director of tax and estate planning at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, to discuss the tax implications of your situation. Then I’ll offer a few suggestions regarding lower-risk investments.

“I’m so sorry to hear about your illness,” Mr. Golombek said. “If you sell the stocks now, there will be capital gains tax payable on the $53,000 of accrued gains at a 50-per-cent inclusion rate. The amount of tax you will pay will depend on the proportionate interest in the joint account, your income level and your province of residence.”

For example, assuming you and your wife contributed funds equally to the stock portfolio, the $53,000 net capital gain would be split equally between you. Each of you would then include half of your respective $26,500 capital gain – or $13,250 each – as taxable income on your 2020 tax returns. At a marginal tax rate of, say, 40 per cent, the tax payable would be $5,300 each, or $10,600 in total.

If the stock portfolio isn’t sold, upon your death your interest in the shares would automatically roll over to your wife’s account. Because the rollover would occur at the adjusted cost base of your shares, there would be no immediate capital gains tax consequences. “However, your wife would pay tax on the entire gain when she ultimately disposes of the shares,” Mr. Golombek said.

Even if the shares are not sold, there is an election that could be made by the executor on your terminal tax return to trigger the gain or loss on some or all of your half of the shares and to report the net capital gain (or loss) on your return, he said. The election would only be made if it makes sense from a tax-minimization perspective.

Story continues below advertisement

“Ultimately, however, if your wife is uncomfortable managing the stocks after you’re gone, it may make sense to trigger the gains now, rather than in six months’ time, especially given unconfirmed rumblings of a potential increase to the capital gains inclusion rate in the upcoming federal budget,” Mr. Golombek said.

What to invest in? Given that your wife’s investing horizon could be many years, if not decades, I believe it would be a mistake to put the entire portfolio into something ultraconservative such as government bonds or guaranteed investment certificates. As a compromise, consider investing in a low-cost balanced mutual fund that provides a mix of fixed-income securities for safety and equities that offer greater potential for long-term growth. By investing in a fund, your wife won’t have to worry about managing a portfolio of individual securities.

One example is the Mawer Balanced Fund, which has about one-third of its assets in primarily Canadian bonds, with the rest spread across Canadian, U.S. and international stocks. The MER for this professionally managed fund is 0.91 per cent, and there is a $5,000 minimum initial investment. Another advantage of owning a mutual fund is that your wife will be able to make contributions or withdrawals without incurring brokerage commissions. Other low-cost fund companies to consider include Steadyhand Investment Funds, Leith Wheeler and Beutel Goodman.

If you want to cut your costs even more, consider one of the newer exchange-traded funds that provide one-stop exposure to a balanced portfolio of index ETFs. An example of these all-in-one ETFs – which are bought and sold like stocks – is Vanguard’s Balanced ETF Portfolio (ticker symbol VBAL). For an MER of 0.25 per cent, VBAL invests 60 per cent of its assets in Canadian, U.S. and global stocks, and 40 per cent in fixed-income securities in Canada and other countries. Vanguard offers four other asset-allocation ETFs with varying levels of equity exposure. Other ETF providers, including iShares and Bank of Montreal, offer similar one-stop ETFs.

By helping your wife choose a solution that keeps her costs reasonably low, requires little monitoring and still produces good long-term returns, you’ll be helping to ensure her peace of mind – and her financial security – after you’re gone.

--John Heinzl

Story continues below advertisement

Do you have a question for Globe Investor? Send it our way via this form. Questions and answers will be edited for length.

What’s up in the days ahead

Many traditional retailers are struggling amid stiff competition from online players, like Amazon.com, and the economic impact from the coronavirus. So why is Aritzia Inc.’s share price cruising near record highs? David Berman finds some answers.

Click here to see the Globe Investor earnings and economic news calendar.

More Globe Investor coverage

For more Globe Investor stories, follow us on Twitter @globeinvestor

Click here share your view of our newsletter and give us your suggestions.

You may also be interested in our Market Update or Carrick on Money newsletters. Explore them on our newsletter signup page.

Compiled by Globe Investor Staff

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies