Skip to main content
//empty //empty

I grew up on television. I watched so much television that I’m embarrassed to even estimate how many hours I spent dully staring at the screen each day – M*A*S*H* and WKRP in Cincinnati reruns, The Flintstones, Cheers, live sports and absolute garbage just to pass the time.

It was ridiculous, and I don’t watch near that much programming – cable or streamed – anymore but that’s still my frame of reference when talking about mass entertainment. So when I read “7 Reasons Why Video Gaming Will Take Over”, written by the former global Head of Strategy for Amazon Studios Matthew Ball, I have trouble wrapping my head around it.

Can gaming be that pervasive? That big a deal? Will Activision Blizzard Inc., Take Two Interactive Software Inc. or Ubisoft Entertainment SA be the next Disney, with live eSports instead of theme parks?

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Ball started his essay by noting that the value of video programming is declining while gaming-related revenue is increasing by 15 to 25 per cent per year. He presents a long and detailed argument that gaming is replacing television by providing the same benefits, only in a more engaging format. He writes, “When atomized, it’s clear that essentially every single element of [the] TV experience is now being replicated by the gaming ecosystem.”

In 2018, the gaming industry brought in an estimated US$131-billion and the high rate of growth is expected to push revenues to $300-billion by 2025.

Images of stadiums packed with spectators watching eSports still surprise me but that, again, is likely the function of an outdated perspective. Quoted in a December 2019 Business Insider report, venture capitalist Rick Yang highlighted eSports as indicative of a sea change in mass media: “I actually think of esports as the mainstreaming of gaming, or the pop culture instantiation of gaming versus the pure idea of these players becoming professionals to compete at the highest levels."

The vast majority of investment assets are held by people over 50 for the simple reason they’ve had longer to save and ride equity and bond markets higher. The average age of a gamer has been rising but it’s still more prevalent among younger generations, so most investors are unfamiliar with the industry. They might be missing a massive investable trend that’s happening in plain sight, right beneath their noses.

I don’t own any gaming stocks either but it’s time to overcome a reluctance based on media consumption habits from the 1980s and 1990s. The easiest way for investors to participate in the trend is through the ETFMG Video Game Tech ETF.

-- Scott Barlow, Globe and Mail market strategist

This is the Globe Investor newsletter, published three times each week. If someone has forwarded this e-mail newsletter to you or you’re reading this on the web, you can sign up for the newsletter and others on our newsletter signup page.

Story continues below advertisement

Stocks to ponder

TMX Group Ltd. Lou Eccleston is retiring early as chief executive of TMX Group Ltd., adding one more concern to a stock that has a high valuation and a company that reported weak trading volumes and financial activity last year. Are the risks outweighing the potential gains here? David Berman has this analysis.

Enbridge Inc. As recently as last August, you could have picked up shares in the pipeline company for about $43. Since then, they have gained more than 21 per cent. With a yield of 6.2 per cent, Enbridge is suddenly attracting investor interest again. What happened? Gordon Pape explains.

The Rundown

BlackRock’s green investing strategy is not a moral awakening

Larry Fink, arguably the world’s most powerful investor, has just delivered his annual letter to chief executives. This year, the chairman of giant money manager BlackRock Inc. used his institutional pulpit to thunder about the mounting dangers of climate change and preach the virtues of sustainable investing. It is all good, praiseworthy stuff from a company with nearly US$7-trillion in assets under management. Just don’t assume it means a major shift in policy. Ian McGugan explains.

Story continues below advertisement

Here’s what you’re giving up if you choose a government bond over a GIC

Is the safety of government bonds worth it if you’re a safety-first investor? The short answer to this question is no, Rob Carrick explains. Not with yields on both federal and provincial government bonds as low as they are today. You’re better off with guaranteed investment certificates from alternative banks and trust companies that are part of a deposit-insurance plan.

Others (for subscribers)

The 5 top-performing Canadian equity analysts – and their stock picks for 2020

Contra Guys: Investors shouldn’t be afraid to swing for the fences once and awhile

Wednesday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades

Story continues below advertisement

Wednesday’s Insider Report: These two REITs are being purchased

Number Cruncher: Four timber companies that could shore up a green economy

Number Cruncher: A closer look at 11 dividend stocks in volatile gold sector

Survey: Oil prices expected to stay around $65 to $70 through 2024

Others (for everyone)

BlackRock CEO: Investors not ‘overzealous’ on equities despite rally

Story continues below advertisement

Globe Advisor

RRSPs are a great way to hold these six U.S. dividend stocks

Are you a financial advisor? Register for Globe Advisor (www.globeadvisor.com) for free daily and weekly newsletters, in-depth industry coverage and analysis, and access to ProStation - a powerful tool to help you manage your clients’’ portfolios.

Ask Globe Investor

Question: I have invested a total of $270,000 in my name, wife’s name, and daughter’s name in Mawer Balanced Fund. I would like to invest another $100,000 in the same fund. Is this too much to invest in the same fund or should we split it? I like the fund because it is balanced and carefully managed. Your comments would be highly appreciated. I am 80, wife 72, and daughter 42.

Answer: First, let me say that this is an excellent fund, with a great track record. According Morningstar, the average annual return over the decade to Dec. 20 is 9.49 per cent. Equally important for conservative investors is the fact the fund had only one losing year during that time, a fractional drop of 0.3 per cent in 2018. The MER is a reasonable 0.91 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

That said, I would never advise investing more than 25 per cent of your assets in a single fund. Things can go wrong, even with the best-managed portfolios. If the new investment would exceed that target, you may want to look at other options. – G.P.

If you have a money question you’d like me to answer, please send it to gpape@rogers.com and write “Globe Question” in the subject line. I can’t guarantee a personal response, but I’ll answer as many as possible in this space.

With that, Happy New Year to all. I’ll be back in 2020.

--Gordon Pape

Do you have a question for Globe Investor? Send it our way via this form. Questions and answers will be edited for length.

What’s up in the days ahead

Tim Shufelt looks at what’s fuelling a mega rally in shares of Ballard Power, the fuel cell company that burned investors years ago but is now one of the top performers on the TSX over the last few months.

Click here to see the Globe Investor earnings and economic news calendar.

More Globe Investor coverage

For more Globe Investor stories, follow us on Twitter @globeinvestor

Click here share your view of our newsletter and give us your suggestions.

You may also be interested in our Market Update or Carrick on Money newsletters. Explore them on our newsletter signup page.

Compiled by Globe Investor Staff

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies