Skip to main content

A man shows Argentine pesos outside a bank in Buenos Aires' financial district, Argentina, Aug. 30, 2018.

MARCOS BRINDICCI/Reuters

Argentina’s latest financial market shock has failed to swamp other emerging markets in the way its previous plunges have done – in part due to the increasing isolation of the country’s credit and investments from the rest of the pool.

Argentina’s economy and banking system are probably too small to cause significant ripple effects by themselves. And while emerging economies are clearly under pressure from global trade and recession fears, they have not yet been materially infected by Argentina’s latest shock.

An estimated US$3.4-billion has exited emerging markets outside Latin America so far this week, Institute of International Finance data show, but analysts say only a part of that outflow is likely due to fallout from Argentine President Mauricio Macri’s heavy defeat in Sunday’s primary election – a result that’s seen the peso lose more than a third of its value in just three days.

Story continues below advertisement

Argentina’s currency plunge has echoes of its previous traumatic episode in 2018 which contributed to billions of dollars being pulled from emerging markets around the world.

This week’s jolt initially sparked some debt and equity selling in South Africa, Indonesia and Thailand and currency losses for Turkey, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa.

However, the shock waves have been less severe so far this time and by the end of the week the contagion beyond Argentina began to fade. Analysts cited the country’s idiosyncratic situation and likened its string of recent crises – in 2001, 2014 and 2018, as well as 2019 – to a diminishing echo.

“The direct fallout from Argentina’s crisis on the rest of the emerging world should be limited, since Argentina’s economic footprint has diminished and it is a relatively closed economy,” said Stéphanie de Torquat, macro strategist at Lombard Odier.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index for stocks is down 1.4 per cent for the week, less than the 2.2 per cent dip in its global all-country equivalent. Argentina accounts for an aggregate weight of only 0.26 per cent within the index, significantly smaller than the weight of the largest five countries. Neighboring Brazil’s weighting is 8.1 per cent.

Bond markets have also rebounded, with the Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets USD Aggregate Index back in positive territory for the month, reversing a 1-per-cent slide in the wake of the election outcome.

“Argentina isn’t the largest [debt] issuer in emerging markets, it is just 2 per cent or 2.5 per cent in the indices, so it’s fairly manageable from a broader contagion perspective,” said Shamaila Khan, director of emerging market debt at AllianceBernstein in New York. “In a year like this when emerging markets has had very strong returns I do not think that the price movement in Argentina is going to derail the appetite for emerging markets.”

Story continues below advertisement

Argentina’s economy, South America’s second largest, has been mired in recession since last year, while assets in its banking system, which has so far held up relatively well, account for around 20 per cent of GDP.

Brazil, one of its main trading partners, is most vulnerable to direct contagion, but Argentina’s trade with other emerging markets is more limited beyond China, Chile and Vietnam.

“Argentina’s event can amplify any negative news on the global front,” said Magdalena Polan, global emerging markets economist at Legal & General Investment Management.

Some of the bond and equity outflows from non-Latin American emerging markets this week might be due to foreign investors offloading other holdings as they’re unable to liquidate loss positions in Argentina.

“The main impact to emerging markets is not through direct economic or financial linkages but rather portfolio VaR shocks that could necessitate reducing risk, or hedging exposure, in other high beta, high yield fixed income exposures,” said Jason Daw, Société Générale’s head of emerging market strategy.

VaR shocks can happen when a spike in losses in one market can force portfolio managers to sell other parts of their portfolio to bolster cash holdings in their funds.

Story continues below advertisement

Third quarter outflows from non-Chinese emerging markets were around US$11-billion so far, short of the US$15-billion offloaded in 2018, according to Robin Brooks, chief economist at IIF. Then financial crises in Argentina and Turkey, as well as China and U.S. trade tensions, spread to South Africa, Indonesia and Brazil.

The 2018 sell-off was larger than during 2013’s taper-tantrum, when investors dumped emerging market assets after the Federal Reserve hinted at a reduction in stimulus, IIF data shows.

Still, unlike last year when emerging markets faced added pressure from rising interest rates, this time a more dovish monetary policy stance from the Fed and other leading central banks appear to be offering a softer landing even if the more bullish hopes of a big 2019 recovery have been dashed again.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies