Skip to main content

Kevin McCreadie is CEO and chief investment officer of AGF Management Ltd.

The United States election is now less than a year away and the attention it garners in the coming months will be unprecedented. At no time recently has the political climate been so divisive as it is today, all the while being played out in a hyped-up communications age that scrutinizes every move made and every word tweeted by the candidates running for office and the pundits who influence the race.

But for all the potential implications the election holds, investors need to be careful not to get overly caught up in the spectacle. While politics will play an important role in shaping markets in 2020, it’s the late-cycle global economy that is most important and the direction it takes over the next year may have the biggest impact on asset prices.

Story continues below advertisement

That’s not to say the two don’t mix. Government has had a hand in many of the issues that have dogged economic conditions this past year, not just in the U.S. where the longest expansion on record has been teetering, but elsewhere around the world where slower growth and recession risks have also been a concern.

None of these issues is bigger than the ongoing trade impasse between the U.S. and China, which according to a recent United Nations report, has been a “lose/lose” for both countries and because of the tit-for-tat tariffs levied, is estimated to have cost the global economy tens of billions of dollars.

Though tenuous, the recent trade truce between the two sides is a step in the right direction. It could very soon result in a phase one deal that includes the U.S. agreeing to cancel additional tariffs on Chinese imports set to take effect in mid-December, while also rolling back some of it’s existing duties. In return, China would likely need to address U.S. intellectual property and financial services concerns as well as commit to purchasing more U.S. agricultural products going forward.

If struck, such an agreement would no doubt remove a major headwind for the economy and provide a potential boost to risk assets like stocks and high-yield credit. But the opposite might also be true if phase one of the deal is delayed, new tariffs are put in place, or worse, negotiations break down entirely.

Even if phase one gets done, it’s unclear whether there is enough shared political will to continue hammering out a more comprehensive deal. China, for example, may decide it’s better to see how the U.S. election plays out before getting back to the table. It would likely prefer to negotiate with a moderate like Joe Biden rather than U.S. President Trump, but would be leery of someone like Elizabeth Warren winning the Democratic nomination given her hard stance on human rights and the escalating protests in Hong Kong.

The ongoing impeachment process also might not help. While it’s unlikely that Trump will be convicted early in the New Year, a trial for his ouster could still be a distraction.

In any case, the trade impasse between China and the U.S. may finally be coming to a head after more than a year of false starts and stalemating, giving investors some much needed clarity on the issue, if not exactly what they wish for.

Story continues below advertisement

The same is true of Brexit, another stubborn economic headwind—especially for Europe—that could come to some type of resolution at the end of January.

The outcomes of these two highly-charged political decisions will also continue to hold sway over central bank policy, including the U.S. Federal Reserve that is back in a holding pattern after cutting interest three times earlier this year.

Ultimately, the global economy hangs in the balance heading into 2020 and could go either way. That doesn’t mean a recession is imminent if trade talks between China and the U.S. break down, or Britain leaves the European Union without a deal. In fact, economic data has steadied in recent weeks and remains resilient in many parts of the world, but at this late stage in the cycle, it may not take much to tip it over.

In this environment, investors will need to keep close watch on economic indicators such as weekly U.S. jobless claims and global purchasing manager indexes, which fell throughout 2019, but may be close to bottoming.

They will need to weigh their various options carefully as well. Stock and bond markets could turn on a dime depending on the direction the economy takes and allocations to both may be safer when complemented by alternative asset classes and strategies that offer the potential of non-correlated returns.

Portfolio positioning

Story continues below advertisement

From an asset allocation perspective, rather than a traditional 60/40 portfolio mix of 60% equities and 40% fixed income, we are slightly underweight both stocks and bonds, with cash making up the difference, heading into the New Year. In addition, we have hedged our equity position with a small allocation toward an alternative market-neutral anti-beta strategy.

We are overweight emerging markets equities, and believe European stocks are starting to look compelling from a valuation standpoint assuming a cyclical rebound in growth. A positive near-term backdrop for Canada, meanwhile, is overshadowed by negative sentiment towards key sectors.

For fixed income, we also like emerging markets and remain positive on high-yield credit.

In the end, the global economy could be in much better shape heading into 2020 than many investors might have expected just a few months ago. But when it comes to the economic cycle, there’s no question it’s getting late and investors need to carefully consider what impact that could have on their portfolios.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies