Skip to main content

Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during the second and final presidential debate Thursday, Oct. 22, 2020, at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn..

The Associated Press

With just over a week to go before the U.S. presidential election, investors may be placing too much confidence in a decisive win by Democratic challenger Joe Biden as his lead in opinion polls narrows.

Market participants have in recent weeks pulled back from bets that would benefit from election-related volatility while piling into assets that would benefit from a Biden win, including alternative energy shares and cannabis stocks.

As Mr. Biden’s lead has narrowed in recent days, some market watchers worry that an unexpected victory by U.S. President Donald Trump, a Republican, or an uncertain election outcome could force the type of violent positioning unwinds that occurred in 2016, when investors were overwhelmingly positioned for a Hillary Clinton presidency.

Story continues below advertisement

In betting markets, Mr. Trump’s chances of winning the election increased about one percentage point to 36.3 per cent after Thursday’s debate, but Mr. Biden maintains a significant lead, with a 64.4-per-cent chance of winning the election, according to data from RealClearPolitics.

“To some extent the markets are underappreciating the likelihood of a Trump rebound here,” said Karl Schamotta, chief global strategist at Cambridge Global Payments.

After the election, traders expect the biggest market swings to occur in equities. Among the assets vulnerable to violent moves is the Invesco Solar ETF. The exchange-traded fund has risen about 24 per cent over the past month as investors anticipate that clean-energy policies under a Biden administration would bode well for the sector.

Options prices suggest the ETF’s shares could log a one-day move of as much as 11 per cent in either direction once the election results are out, according to calculations by Christopher Murphy, co-head of derivatives strategy at Susquehanna Financial Group.

The technology-heavy Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 ETF and the S&P 500-tracking ETF SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust are each primed for a move of about 3 per cent to 4 per cent, Murphy said.

An unexpected Trump win could also hit currencies such as the Mexican peso and Russian ruble, while boosting the battered U.S. dollar, analysts said.

Utility firms, tax-exempt municipal bonds, industrials and material stocks may also be vulnerable, said Justin Waring, investment strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management.

Story continues below advertisement

Treasury yields, which move inversely to prices, rose to four-month highs on Friday, a day after Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump squared off in a final debate that some observers said was unlikely to improve the incumbent’s re-election prospects.

Some investors believe a Biden win could usher in higher spending and weigh on bonds.

Some market watchers have also noted that investors, while still far more hedged against markets swings than in the 2016 election cycle, have pared bets on wild stock market gyrations over the past two weeks.

S&P 500 options expiring in December are implying a more muted level of stock swings than they did just two weeks ago, suggesting expectations for market turmoil after the election results have come in.

Equity and interest-rate options “are pricing in that Biden wins the presidential election,” said Amy Wu Silverman, equity derivatives strategist at RBC Dominion Securities. “They’re fairly complacent on that, as well as the idea of a ‘blue sweep.’”

While the market fears of election-related volatility have receded somewhat, by no means have investors sounded the all-clear signal. The Cboe Volatility Index, known as Wall Street’s “fear gauge,” stands above 28, significantly higher than the low- to mid-teen range it was trading in just prior to the 2016 presidential election.

Story continues below advertisement

An uncertain or contested election would likely result in even more sustained volatility. The S&P 500 slipped as much as 10 per cent in the weeks after the 2000 election, before the Supreme Court decided the hotly contested battle between George W. Bush and Al Gore for the presidency.

Such a period of uncertainty could hit the market’s biggest winners, including the technology and momentum stocks that have been a key driver of the S&P 500′s rebound, said Joseph Amato, president and chief investment officer of equities at Neuberger Berman Group PLC.

“If you have a risk-off environment because of a contested election then you probably have vulnerability on those stocks that have done the best,” Mr. Amato said. “Quite often in a risk-off scenario you often sell your big winners first.”

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies