Skip to main content

Two new BlackRock Inc. funds that exclude gun makers are off to slow starts as socially minded investors embrace other products addressing a wide range of issues such as environmental and governance concerns, according to flow data at the world’s largest asset manager.

Investor scrutiny of gun makers picked up after last year’s mass shooting at a Florida high school and has continued through more recent attacks, including in Texas and Ohio last weekend. Some activists have urged asset managers to drop holdings such as Sturm Ruger & Co. and American Outdoor Brands Corp.

Rather than divest, BlackRock in the spring of 2018 took steps like introducing a pair of gun-free funds to give investors alternatives to traditional products such as the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, which holds 2 per cent of both Sturm Ruger and American Outdoor.

Story continues below advertisement

The two new funds have not taken off. The iShares ESG MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF held US$52-million as of July 31, dwarfed by the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, with US$44-billion. The other, the iShares ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF, had about US$69-million.

Both fund totals are “extremely modest,” said Todd Rosenbluth, senior director at research firm CFRA.

At the same time, he said flows to environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds have spiked overall as investors focus on subjects such as the impact of climate change at energy companies or gender pay disparities at technology firms.

Lipper data show that together, all iShares ESG funds had net deposits of US$3.2-billion during the 12 months ended July 31, with the bulk of that, US$2.4-billion, coming during 2019. To be sure, the ESG inflow was a small slice of the US$143-billion in net deposits to all iShares funds during the 12-month period.

“Unfortunately, although there have been horrific events of gun violence, it doesn’t seem investors are keeping it top-of-mind,” Mr. Rosenbluth said. The overall interest in ESG funds, he said, shows “the investment appeal is broader than any subject that’s being excluded,” he noted.

A BlackRock spokesman did not comment or give details about other steps it has taken, such as new gun-free products for pension plans.

Several large banks last year limited financing for gun makers and retailers, but the move had little impact on an industry whose many small manufacturers are able to tap other sources of credit. At gun maker annual meetings last year, top asset managers voted in favour of shareholder calls for safety reports, but also backed directors.

Story continues below advertisement

At its annual shareholder meeting this fall, American Outdoor, parent of Smith & Wesson, will face a shareholder call for the company to adopt a “human rights” policy the company says is vague and could expose it to liability.

Morningstar director Jon Hale said worried investors could relax about gun makers that make up tiny fractions of big index funds, which account for most of the gun makers’ top investors. More important is the pressure fund firms can bring on gun makers, he said.

The outcome of owning gun stocks in a diversified index fund, Mr. Hale said, “is a de minimis impact on your portfolio.”

Related topics

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies