Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Britain is rushing out rules to make London’s stock market attractive for ‘blank check’ listing vehicles as bankers ready a string of potential floats in Europe as interest in the U.S. fades.

Special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) have been the biggest trend in global capital markets in 2020 and 2021, with investors pouring more than $300 billion into listing these shell companies before they identify and acquire a business - effectively writing a blank check. They offer target companies an easier, quicker listing route at a guaranteed price at a time when many IPOs have failed.

So far, the frenzy has passed by Europe’s biggest financial center, partly because its rules don’t allow investors more of a say on the acquisition or the option to take out their money if they don’t like the target company. But now Britain, trying to keep the City of London competitive after Brexit, is on the cusp of changing that.

Story continues below advertisement

Bankers say several SPAC candidates are waiting in the wings for a London float once new rules come in, by “early summer” according to the Financial Conduct Authority.

“I would probably say we will have 30-40 spacs across Europe in 2021 and London is a big part of that if the rules are adjusted in time,” said Lyle Schwartz, co-head of alternative equity products at Goldman Sachs in Europe, their unit that looks after SPAC listings.

The depth of international liquidity in London’s markets and wide choice of acquisitions would be a draw.

Schwartz said around 30 potential SPAC sponsors, who are generally well-known, deep pocketed institutions or individuals, are in discussions with regulators in Europe and about a dozen of them are now engaging with potential investors.

Time is of the essence as the market for SPACs in the U.S. is already losing momentum with the prospect of rising interest rates, a saturated market and a general shift away from so-called “growth” sector investments.

The fear is that Europe has “come to the party while everyone is getting taxis to go home,” said Tom Matthews, a partner at White & Case in London.

“We have been a bit green with envy at all the activity across the pond, but that said I do believe the changes recommended in the Hill review will make a difference,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Former European Commissioner Jonathan Hill undertook a review for the British government on developing markets after Brexit and said there was a “real danger” fast growing British tech companies would list in Europe or the U.S. if the country’s SPAC rules were not changed.

Following his review, Britain’s regulators have proposed SPACs which comply with a higher level of investor protection requirements won’t have to suspend trading once they identify a takeover target.

This would avoid locking investors in for an uncertain period of time, which has deterred SPACs from listing in London.

“We are still seeing a lot of interest for SPACs listings in London. We think it is a sensible and viable option for some companies and believe that with the proposed changes SPACs will form a subset of the market,” said Charlie Walker, head of equity and fixed income primary markets at the London Stock Exchange.

HOSTILE RECEPTION

Some major fund managers, however, have expressed disquiet.

Story continues below advertisement

“In a traditional IPO, bankers work for years with these companies to get them public market ready,” said Adam Welham, head of equity capital markets in Europe for Fidelity Investments.

“If you just have someone coming along and saying we’ve got the vehicle to make you public and you’ll be done and you don’t have to go through all the diligence and learning about what becoming a public company entails, there’s potential for things to go wrong.”

Richard Buxton, head of strategy in the UK for British money manager Jupiter, said SPACs smack of a late cycle trend that London should not be bending over backwards to accommodate. “I just think it’s wrong to be joining in this regulatory rush to the bottom,” he said.

Yet, a few high profile SPAC deals in Europe have had success.

British technology investor Ian Osborne -- best known for his SPAC forays with Chamath Palihapatiya in the United States -- saw his Amsterdam blank check firm Hedosophia European Growth several times covered last week.

Pegasus, a joint venture between banking veteran Jean-Pierre Mustier and France’s richest man Bernard Arnault, also received a warm reception at the Dutch stock exchange.

Story continues below advertisement

Osborne is said to be looking at teaming up with his U.S. SPAC partner Palihapatiya for another blank check foray in London, according to a source familiar with that situation.

Several other private equity firms and corporates are also considering SPAC listings in London and elsewhere in Europe, bankers said.

“My feeling is that investors will be quite selective but sponsors with the type of quality and profile as Pegasus will get deals done,” said Giacomo Ciampolini, who heads alternative equity unit at Citi for the EMEA region. (Reporting by Abhinav Ramnarayan;Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies