Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Macro hedge funds drew in huge inflows and chalked up stellar returns in the second quarter, but stubbornly low volatility and an eerie calm over financial markets since then suggest they may struggle to maintain that performance for the rest of the year.

Macro funds rely on the price anomalies, widening spreads and arbitrage opportunities thrown up by high volatility and choppy trading conditions in fixed income, currencies and commodities, as well as taking big, directional bets on interest rates and exchange rates.

It’s not that macro funds have performed badly this year. Spurts of volatility in February and June helped deliver solid first and second quarters, but keeping that up through year-end will require higher volatility.

Story continues below advertisement

The paradox is that volatility is stubbornly low despite unusually high uncertainty over how governments and central banks exit pandemic crisis levels of fiscal and monetary support, and how economies hold up.

If this is true, the Federal Reserve is likely to be more cautious about dialling down stimulus and delay tapering its monthly purchases of US$120-billion of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities. All else being equal, this is bad news for macro hedge fund managers.

A strategist at one big macro fund in New York contacted last week could be speaking for the entire industry: “I don’t care where the volatility comes from, as long as we have it.”

The ‘Macro Strategies’ benchmark index of hedge fund industry data provider Preqin rose 6.18 per cent in the first eight months of the year. Its 4.37-per-cent rise in the second quarter was the third-highest quarterly return in at least a decade.

Similarly, HFR’s macro total index was up 7.96 per cent in the January-August period, outpacing the 5.38-per-cent gain last year and 6.50-per-cent rise in 2019. At this rate, 2021 will be the best year since 2010.

Investors are clearly getting on board. HFR data show an estimated US$8.35-billion of inflows in the second quarter, the most in 10 years, while Preqin’s US$10.3-billion inflow was the highest by their measure since 2017.

Still, an investor putting cash into the S&P 500 index on Jan. 1 is sitting on total returns of 21 per cent and while the Bank of America U.S. Treasury bond index may be down 1.5 per cent on a year-to-date basis, it is up 3 per cent from its low in March.

Story continues below advertisement

A traditional 60-40 equities/bonds portfolio is comfortably outperforming macro funds this year. A glance at the longer-term ebb and flow of volatility shows what macro funds are up against.

Take major currency markets. Refinitiv data show the pivotal euro/dollar exchange rate is on course for its narrowest trading range in any year since its launch in 1999, oscillating in a 687-pip range between US$1.1662 and US$1.2349.

That is even narrower than 2019 when it meandered between US$1.0877 and US$1.1570, a range of just 693 pips. Three-month implied euro/dollar volatility slumped to a low at the time of 4 per cent late that year, before dipping below 4 per cent in February, 2020, on the eve of the COVID-19 pandemic.

This gauge of volatility in the world’s most important and liquid currency market fell below 5 per cent last week for the first time since February last year.

It’s a similar, though less dramatic, story in Treasuries. Implied three-month U.S. bond market volatility as measured by the MERMOVE index slumped from a pandemic peak to an all-time low late last year. It has risen since, but remains extremely low by historical standards.

Thanks to years of near-zero interest rates across most of the developed world, rates and currency market volatility has steadily been eroded. So much so that since 2012 macro funds have recorded an overall net outflow of US$74-billion, according to HFR.

Story continues below advertisement

They will be hoping a recent pickup in volatility because of deteriorating U.S. economic data, jitters over the Delta COVID-19 variant and worries that Wall Street may be ripe for a correction is the start of something more prolonged.

Strategists at Goldman Sachs suggest a turn is close at hand. They point out that periods of low volatility have become shorter over the past 20 years and the link between previous and coming volatility has virtually disappeared.

“Because the link between past and future volatility has weakened, investors should be cautious in extrapolating the current low volatility regime too far in the future,” they wrote in a note last week.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies