Skip to main content
//empty //empty

A Tesla supercharger is shown at a charging station in Santa Clarita, California, U.S. Oct. 2, 2019.

MIKE BLAKE/Reuters

Tesla Inc. investors were disappointed after the company was snubbed in the S&P 500′s latest round of inclusions, but the electric automaker’s entry could still happen at any time and a merger by others in the benchmark index might help.

Merger activity within the S&P 500 has historically been the biggest reason companies leave the index, and could provide an opening for a company like Tesla, said two sources familiar with how the committee has made decisions.

While some in the market have questioned the quality of Tesla’s earnings, it was still widely expected to gain entry to the benchmark.

Story continues below advertisement

“It will go into the S&P. There’s no way it cannot at some point,” said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment strategist at Inverness Counsel in New York. “Maybe it’s in the penalty box right now while they just assess the situation.”

While Tesla’s valuation “seems absolutely crazy” the company cannot be ignored, he added.

A spokesman for S&P declined to comment. Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Picking which companies make it in the S&P 500 is part science, part art. There are formal criteria a company is expected to meet, around things such as profitability, share float and market capitalization, but the index committee has leeway in deciding who makes the cut.

The S&P 500′s aim is not to beat the market, but to emulate the performance of its 11 sectors, as well the 156 subindustries within those sectors.

Tesla, as an automaker, is part of the consumer discretionary sector, which currently has an 11.4-per-cent weighting in the index. That sector also includes companies such as retailers, home builders and restaurants.

The index committee aims to pick the companies that best represent their industries, while keeping the weighting of the sector in check against the others, which include information technology, health care and financials, so the index’s performance matches that of the overall market, one source said.

Story continues below advertisement

Mergers among companies in the index give committee members – the names of whom S&P does not make public – additional opportunities to readjust weightings based on the ever-changing dynamic of the market.

Tesla’s shares, for instance, have skyrocketed more than 300 per cent this year, making it the world’s most valuable automaker, and changing the entire sector’s footprint. Since the S&P’s latest index decision, Tesla stock is down more than 10 per cent.

When Tesla in July reported its fourth straight quarterly profit, one condition for S&P 500 entry, many investors believed it was destined for admission, helping fuel the rally in the company’s shares.

But Tesla was not on the list of new additions announced Sept. 4 ahead of the index’s quarterly rebalancing on Sept. 18.

The committee’s decision “can only have come from a collective and committed view that [Tesla] is profoundly overvalued and sits on shakier fundamentals than its mega market cap indicates,” said DataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas.

Still, he said he was “surprised” Tesla was not admitted.

Story continues below advertisement

The omission came as Tesla’s latest earnings showed the sale of emissions credits to other car makers helped make up for losses in its core autos business.

At any moment there are 25 to 50 companies that technically qualify to be in the index, but are not in, and a handful of those are companies the committee agrees are acceptable candidates when discussed in its monthly meetings, one source said.

With a big name like Tesla, it is tempting to look for a big exit from the index, the person said, adding that the committee tracks announced mergers, which are opportunities to make unscheduled additions.


Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies